Where Are Oprah Winfrey and Gayle King?

The Deafening Silence Surrounding Their Support for the Markles

The silence surrounding Oprah Winfrey and Gayle King is becoming increasingly noticeable.

These two trusted friends, who played a pivotal role in helping the Markles break free from their British Royal Family confinement and capitalize on their titles, seem to have vanished.

Oprah, in particular, is feeling embarrassed and regretful for giving them a platform that now seems to have made her look foolish.

According to Woman's Day, Winfrey turned against Meghan and Harry after discovering that they had lied to her during their now-infamous meeting last year.

Following the meeting, various media outlets rushed to debunk many of the assertions made by the Sussexes.

As soon as Oprah realized that some of the words spoken by Meghan and Harry had been exaggerated or outright false, she was furious and felt deceived.

The newspaper highlights Oprah's ongoing comments about not having certain individuals as her validation, which suggests a fracture in her relationship with the Sussexes.

This is significant because, until recently, it was widely believed that Oprah and Meghan were incredibly close.

However, it appears that their bond has now been strained, as the bookmaker concludes.

Meanwhile, Gayle King finds herself in an even worse situation.

She became the mouthpiece for Meghan and Harry, perhaps enjoying the role a little too much.

Now, the silence from both Oprah and Gayle speaks volumes.

They both appear foolish, having risked their reputations for someone who is considered a D-list actress.

They were easily taken in by Meghan's deceptive tactics.

But why did the highly anticipated interview with Meghan get canceled?

It seems that she lost the support of her A-list allies and is struggling to make progress in America.

Meghan wanted a televised interview instead of a print one but couldn't even secure an appearance on Gayle's morning show.

If you read the interview with Meghan that ran in The Cut, you'll see that the reporter, Alison P. Davis, skillfully turned the tables on her difficult subject.

Davis leaked small but revealing details about Meghan's daughter and even exposed her for giving side-eye.

Davis truly deserves recognition for her brilliant work.

She managed to expose Meghan while seemingly glorifying her, a move that can only be described as genius.

In fact, she deserves not just a raise but also a throne, similar to the one Meghan accused her of sitting on in her Montecito mansion.

As the Daily Mail, a frequent target of Meghan and Harry's lawsuits, aptly put it, the interview was actually quite negative about Meghan.

The Cut, which is part of New York Magazine and known for its woke perspective, was undoubtedly a strategic choice for the Sussexes.

Finally, someone and something had the courage to challenge the Markles and emerge victorious.

Among the standout quotes from the interview are those describing Meghan's extravagant lifestyle and her manner of speaking, which sometimes seems directed by a fictional producer residing in her brain.

Meghan even suggested at one point how the interviewer should transcribe the sounds she was making.

It is clear that Meghan, who sees herself as a legend, falls far short of being an artistic genius like Picasso; she is not even at the level of finger-painting.

The Cut has declared “game, set, match” against Meghan once again, leaving us wondering why it took so long for someone to expose her true colors.

Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams expressed his disappointment with the interview, calling it dreadful and criticizing Meghan's farcical comparison to Mandela's release.