Title: The Mysterious Sealed Records of Archie’s Birth and Baptism

In a surprising turn of events, it has been revealed that there is no birth certificate for Archie, the son of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.

Furthermore, the record of his baptism has been sealed, raising eyebrows and fueling speculation.

A source close to the palace leaked that the late Queen had specifically requested the sealing of Archie's baptism record.

What could be the reason behind such secrecy?

The controversy surrounding Archie's birth and baptism stems from several peculiarities.

Firstly, the metadata from the picture taken during the baptism indicates that it was dated the same day Archie was born.

This raises questions about the authenticity of the event.

During the short ceremony, Meghan and Harry proudly presented Archie III to the world.

The official photo captured Duchess Camilla, Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, baby Archie, and Kate Middleton seated together.

Standing behind them were Prince Charles, Doria Ragland, Princess Diana's sisters Lady Jane Fellows and Lady Sarah McCorkadale, and Prince William.

However, noticeably absent from the picture was Queen Elizabeth herself.

Upon closer examination, doubts have been raised about the legitimacy of the christening photograph.

When zoomed in, Kate appears disproportionately tall, while the edges of William's head and Kate's hair seem distorted.

Furthermore, there are no shadows in the mirror, unlike in a previous wedding photo taken in the same room, which featured reflections of Meghan, Harry, Charles, and others.

Adding to the intrigue, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, did not participate in Archie's baptism.

Reports indicate that he was documented as being elsewhere in York on that very day.

Additionally, William and Kate were seen wearing different clothes when photographed on their way to Windsor, further casting doubt on the authenticity of the baptism pictures.

These discrepancies have led some to question the existence of Archie altogether.

Speculation has grown that Meghan's pregnancy was a sham, and Archie was actually born via surrogate.

Allegedly, Meghan faked her pregnancy after the surrogate gave birth, keeping the child for herself.

There have even been instances where the couple used a doll in videos and photoshoots, further fueling the conspiracy theories.

Initially dismissed as a wild conspiracy theory, the idea of a fake pregnancy gains some credibility when analyzing the available evidence and applying logical reasoning.

The couple's efforts to hide Archie from the media are understandable, but their behavior becomes peculiar when considering their eagerness for attention in other aspects of their lives.

It is worth noting that even the Dutch royal family protects their children from paparazzi shots without resorting to extreme measures.

On the rare occasions when Archie has made appearances, Meghan seemed more than willing to use him as a means to garner attention.

One notable example is the video footage of their visit to South Africa, where she proudly presented Archie to Desmond Tutu.

This raises questions about why they would take a young child on a state visit but not bring him to meet his own grandparents.

While the truth behind Archie's birth and baptism remains shrouded in mystery, it is evident that there are numerous inconsistencies and peculiarities surrounding the events.

The sealed records and the palace's knowledge of the truth only add to the intrigue.

Perhaps, in due time, the sealed record of Archie will be released, shedding light on the enigma that surrounds his existence.