Title: Prince Harry’s Book: A Missed Opportunity for Redemption

Kinsey Schofield Admits She Was Wrong About Prince Harry

In a surprising turn of events, Kinsey Schofield, a close friend of mine, has publicly apologized for her previous support of Prince Harry.

This admission has sparked curiosity among many, including myself.

Let's delve into the details of this revelation.

Since July 2021, I have witnessed Kinsey defend Prince Harry's introspective initiative, known as SPARE.

However, this defense was not without its fair share of criticism from others.

Even though Kinsey appeared on TalkTV regularly alongside our mutual friend Christo Faufas, The Talk, a popular show, dedicated an entire segment to mocking her belief that Prince Harry aimed to establish himself as a thought leader.

While I appreciate Kinsey's optimism, I believe she could have gained a better understanding of the situation by watching more of my videos on Prince Harry.

I have portrayed him as a man capable of sharing the stage with influential figures such as President Barack Obama and Meta's Mark Zuckerberg.

A man who commands hefty sums for his speeches in front of prestigious audiences.

Naturally, one would assume that writing a book would be the next step for someone like him – a means to sell his story and brand himself.

However, I, like many others, had underestimated the direction Prince Harry would take.

I once believed that the book, penned by Harry's ghostwriter, would focus on how the loss of his mother shaped him into the resilient man he is today.

A man who prioritizes happiness over helplessness, family over fortune, and righteousness over riches.

Alas, I was mistaken.

Kinsey, I believe you are being too hard on yourself.

Many of us, including myself, were hopeful that Harry would awaken to the fact that his mother did not strive for him to become a mere puppet, manipulated by others.

We questioned the narrative that Meghan was solely responsible for his actions, as it undermined Harry's agency and accountability.

The victimhood narrative seemed to be a lucrative part of the Sussex brand, but is that really the legacy they want to leave behind?

For three years, Harry and Meghan have lamented their treatment within the institution that granted them their platform.

It was the palace that shaped Meghan into the perfect partner for Harry, shedding her previous image as a Hollywood actress.

Meanwhile, the palace helped Harry move past his past indiscretions, such as the infamous n^ked Vegas romp and insensitive Halloween costumes.

Yet, they now seem to excel at monetizing their grievances, attracting attention from entertainment giants like Netflix and Spotify.

I have my doubts about whether Markle and Harry possess the cunning to deceive executives at these streaming platforms.

Perhaps their intention is simply to remain in the headlines for extended periods.

However, I question whether this type of attention is truly beneficial.

Imagine if Harry and Meghan had chosen a different path in America, establishing relationships with exceptional charities, developing programs for the underprivileged, and working with Hollywood elites to address pressing social issues.

Such actions would have defined them as true change-makers, rather than relying on a single book or victimhood narrative.

The American media, once enamored with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, is now openly challenging their branding strategies.

Outlets like Newsweek and Variety, which previously praised them, now accuse them of lacking depth and being one-trick ponies.

Tina Brown, an author and acquaintance of Princess Diana, points out Meghan's tendency to jump on trending activism hashtags, only to abandon them swiftly.

Their only significant achievement, it seems, is the Invictus Games, an event built upon an existing blueprint created by the very institution they criticize.

It is evident that Harry has not learned valuable lessons during his thirty years within the royal fold.

He fails to understand that silence does not always equate to betrayal.

As he himself quoted Martin Luther King Jr., silence can be the most dignified response, indicating that one is above the fray.

Yet, Harry and Meghan continue to prove to the world the nightmares they claim to have experienced behind palace walls.

Having studied Princess Diana extensively, I am confident she would not endorse such destructive behavior.

Diana took immense pride in being the mother of a future king and desired to witness William's ascension to the throne.

She would have fiercely protected his inheritance from any interference, including that from our modern-day Wallis and Edward.

It is safe to say that many have given Harry numerous chances to redeem himself, to wake up and see the world through the lens his mother wished for him.

Unfortunately, he has chosen a darker path, one that currently provides him and his wife with the spotlight they desire.

However, how long will they be able to sustain this fame before it becomes infamy?

Only time will tell.

Remember to join my locals community, where I share exclusive videos not available anywhere else.

You can become a member for free by following the link in the video description.

This is Jesús Enrique Rosas, the Royal Rogue, signing off with much love and bliss.