**Title: Controversy Surrounding Baby Archie’s Birth Sparks Speculation and Debate**

The arrival of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's first child, Archie, brought about a wave of controversy in the media world.

Breaking away from the traditional royal protocol, the couple decided to forgo the customary photoshoot on the steps of London's Portland Hospital after Archie's birth on May 6, 2019.

Instead, it took two days before photographers were able to capture the first glimpse of the newborn during a photo session at St George's Hall in Windsor Castle.

In a recent interview with Suns Royal Exclusive, renowned British photographer Arthur Edwards, known for his extensive work with the royal family, criticized the Duke and Duchess of Sussex for orchestrating Archie's birth to align with their own preferences rather than following the established postpartum traditions dating back to Princess Anne's era in the 1980s.

Edwards expressed his disapproval, stating that the entire event seemed meticulously staged to cater to the couple's desires.

Edwards highlighted discrepancies in the information provided to the press regarding Meghan's labor and delivery, suggesting that there was a deliberate attempt to mislead the media.

He sarcastically mentioned how the public was kept in the dark about Archie's birth, indicating that the timeline provided was inaccurate.

Originally, it was believed that Meghan would have a home birth at Frogmore Cottage with an all-female midwife team, but due to medical advice, she ended up delivering at the hospital when her son was overdue.

Speculation and rumors have been circulating on social media platforms like Twitter, with some questioning the authenticity of Archie and his younger sister, Lilibet.

There are even suggestions that other mothers might be lending their babies for photo opportunities.

A YouTube video, viewed by over 77,000 people, proposes the theory that Archie could be a realistic doll rather than a real baby, sparking further debate and intrigue.

On the Daily Empress YouTube channel, a video titled “Megan Markle's Fake Baby Exposed” has gained significant attention, with viewers pointing out alleged doll-like features in Archie's appearance.

Some observers noted that during the photo session, Archie appeared motionless in Prince Harry's arms, leading to speculations that the baby might not be real.

Viewers compared this introduction to previous royal baby unveilings, noting differences in the babies' behavior and the parents' demeanor.

The controversy deepened as viewers dissected Harry's comments during interviews about Archie's birth and appearance.

Some interpreted his responses as vague and potentially revealing, hinting at discrepancies in the timeline and age of the newborn.

The debate intensified as individuals analyzed the dynamics between Meghan, Harry, and Archie during public appearances, drawing comparisons to past royal introductions and highlighting perceived inconsistencies in the interactions.

Overall, the scrutiny surrounding Baby Archie's birth and subsequent public appearances has ignited a flurry of discussions and theories online.

While some remain skeptical about the authenticity of the royal baby, others defend the Sussexes, attributing the controversies to media sensationalism and unfounded speculation.

The ongoing debate serves as a reminder of the intense scrutiny faced by members of the royal family and the complexities of navigating public expectations and privacy in the modern age.