Tiggy the Nanny Reveals Startling Revelations About Archie and Lilibet at Meghan’s Birthday Bash

Former nanny Tiggy-leg Burke has spilled some eerie details about Archie and Lilibet during her visit to Meghan's 31st birthday party.

Prince Harry has distanced himself from his British friends and even parted ways with trusted advisors like Tiggy-leg Burke.

Experts on Palace Confidential shed light on the Duke of Sussex's fallout.

During the discussion on Palace Confidential, diary editor Richard Eden, Sarah Vine, and Rebecca English delved into Prince Harry's detachment.

Host Sarah pointed out that the royal is progressively distancing himself from his British roots as he settles into life in the United States.

“I hear that he doesn't talk to any of his old friends.

He doesn't listen to any of his old advisors.

People like Tiggy-leg Burke, who used to be quite key in helping him.

They're just not there anymore,” she explained.

Miss-leg Burke, who previously served as Prince William and Prince Harry's nanny before becoming a personal assistant to Prince Charles, is believed to have maintained a close relationship with the royals throughout their adulthood.

She is also the godmother to Archie, the eldest child of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

Sources suggest that Tiggy-leg Burke's sudden disappearance can be attributed to a shocking discovery she made during her visit to the Sussex's Montecito mansion.

It is said that during Meghan's 41st birthday celebration last year, which was attended by close friends including Gail King, Daniel Martin, Meghan's hairdresser, Abigail Spencer, a co-star from Suits, and David Foster, husband to Meghan's friend Catherine McPhee, there were no signs of Archie and Doria in the house.

The absence of photos of the children and Doria raised questions.

Why were they not displayed?

It is no secret that Harry and Meghan have always emphasized their commitment to protecting Archie and Lilibet.

However, this narrative seems to differ from what was portrayed on their Netflix show.

According to the source, guests not only failed to see any children in the house but also noticed the absence of pictures of Archie and Lilibet.

At the time, Lilibet was just over a year old, so the whereabouts of the newborn became a mystery.

Considering the credibility of the source, there is likely some truth to these claims.

Now, let's address the underlying issue.

If Meghan is as close to her mother as she claims, why wouldn't she display photos of Doria in the house?

Moreover, the existence of Archie and Lilibet is no secret.

The entire world has seen their faces, and their arrivals were highly publicized.

Allegedly, Meghan even announced Archie's impending arrival at Princess Eugenie's wedding.

One possibility is that Doria was looking after the children at another location on the property, and the photos were simply moved or put away.

Let's assume that Meghan wanted the party to be flawless, so she removed all traces of her mother and children to create the illusion of a child-free environment and erase any evidence of her mother's presence.

However, this still leaves the question unanswered: why?