The Sussexes’ Holiday Card: A Delusional Display of Spencer Pride

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have once again stirred the pot with their latest holiday card, a curious blend of sentiment and self-importance.

Released on December 16, the card showcases six photos, but it's the central image that has everyone talking.

In this snapshot, the couple stands with their two children, Archie and Lilibet, along with their family dogs, all captured in a warm embrace.

For those keeping track, this marks the first public glimpse of the Sussex kids since their Netflix docuseries aired two years ago.

While the children's faces remain obscured, one photo shows them joyfully running towards their parents.

But let's be real—it's not just about the blurry images of kids playing.

The real story lies in Harry's recent comments, where he boldly claims that his children have inherited the “strong” red hair gene from the Spencer lineage.

It seems he's quite proud of this genetic connection, suggesting that the Spencer name carries a certain weight, especially when it comes to their family legacy.

But here's where things get a bit dicey.

Harry's assertion raises eyebrows, particularly given that the evidence is based on nothing more than the back of a child's head.

Are we really supposed to take this as definitive proof of their Spencer heritage?

It's a stretch, to say the least.

While Harry's enthusiasm for his ancestry is commendable, it's hard to ignore the fact that red hair is a recessive trait.

So, unless Meghan has magically transformed into the ultimate ginger gene carrier, this narrative feels a bit far-fetched.

Moreover, if these kids are as “ginger strong” as Harry claims, how does that reconcile with Lilibet's reported 43% Nigerian heritage?

The contradictions are piling up.

It's fascinating how Harry and Meghan seem fixated on the Spencer lineage, particularly given that they have other familial roots worth acknowledging, such as Meghan's mother, Doria Ragland.

Yet, the focus remains squarely on Diana's family, almost to the exclusion of all else.

And let's not forget about their ardent supporters, affectionately dubbed “squaddies,” who are adamant about proclaiming that the couple's only grandchild looks just like Diana.

It's amusing, considering that Lilibet has been something of a mystery baby since her first birthday, with her face rarely seen in public.

So, what exactly are fans basing these comparisons on?

The back of her head?

It's a puzzling situation that raises more questions than answers.

Then there's the glaring contradiction in their stance on privacy.

They claim to prioritize shielding their children from the public eye, yet here they are, featuring the back of their heads on a holiday card for all to see.

It's hard not to find the irony in this move, which seems to contradict their stated desire for privacy.

It appears that their need for public recognition often outweighs their claims of wanting to protect their kids.

The entire Spencer gene narrative is becoming increasingly convoluted, bordering on narcissistic.

It's evident that Harry and Meghan are desperate to cling to Princess Diana's legacy, even if it means presenting dubious claims and blurry photos to support their narrative.

You'd think that with their royal connections and considerable wealth, they could find a way to navigate this without looking so absurd.

As the Sussexes continue to push their version of family history, one can't help but wonder how long this will go on.

Their attempts to intertwine their children's identities with Diana's legacy feel not just misguided, but also tiresome.

The desire to be seen as part of a royal lineage is palpable, but at what cost?

In the end, while the Sussexes' holiday card may be a heartfelt gesture, it also reflects a deeper obsession with their ancestry that seems out of touch with reality.

Perhaps it's time for them to consider a more balanced approach to their family narrative, one that doesn't rely solely on the shadows of the past.