The n^ked Truth About Archie and Lily Gives Meghan a Headache

Rumors and speculations surrounding the true identity of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's children, Archie and Lily, continue to circulate.

Many are questioning whether the couple has been using rented children or realistic copies for financial gain.

However, it seems unlikely that we will ever see the Sussex Invisible Children or any convincing replicas being paraded around.

The parents of these children, who have allegedly been hired to pose as Archie and Lily, must surely understand the risks and ethical concerns associated with such a scheme.

It is also possible that they are bound by non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).

The lack of a DNA test for Archie and Lily adds fuel to the fire.

Conflicting stories have emerged, with some claiming that Harry did undergo a DNA test which initially indicated that Archie was not his child, but later tests proved otherwise.

Others argue that Harry never took a DNA test at all.

The truth remains elusive.

One notable incident that raised eyebrows was the polo match where Meghan appeared with the new baby, only to be ordered to leave by Harry.

A photograph captured a couple gazing in awe at the baby, while other members of the royal family kept their distance.

This incident coincided with criticism directed at Meghan for her unconventional way of carrying the baby.

Speculation suggests that the real parents of Archie are British and that he resides in the UK, while rented children are used to portray him in the US.

As for Lily, she was allegedly rented from the UK, as evidenced by the lack of any other photos of her in the US, except for a peculiar parade picture where Meghan herself appeared with a mustache and Archie went unnoticed.

There are even claims that Meghan and Harry employed the rent-a-child scam in Africa, staging photos to create a false narrative.

The question arises: how is it possible to have children after undergoing a hysterectomy, as Meghan has claimed?

The mounting criticism and whispers behind their backs likely contributed to the couple's decision to leave.

It is inconceivable to claim that they have children living within the royal residence, yet no one ever sees them.

While this may not have long-term consequences for the royal family, Charles should ensure that these fabricated children are removed from their website.

The royals' silence on the matter may be attributed to a super injunction, which prevents them from speaking out until Meghan signs divorce papers.

However, the public is becoming increasingly skeptical about the existence of these invisible children.

As time passes, it will become more challenging to maintain the illusion.

The absurdity of this scheme reflects the foolishness of Meghan and Harry, who have a track record of concocting outlandish stories, such as the near-catastrophic car chase in New York traffic.

It is evident that many people find the whole situation perplexing.

The plan devised by globalists at Soho House to undermine the British royal family has backfired.

The public is growing tired of the subterfuge and demands the truth.

The alleged photographs of Megan and Archie on the beach were quickly debunked, as they featured Megan's friend Brynn and her son Gavin instead.

Brynn's silence raises questions about her role in this charade, especially now that she works for CNN.

Similarly, the photo supposedly depicting Megan and Lily on the 4th of July was confirmed to be a photoshopped image of Jack Brooksbanks and his child.

If Meghan attempts to deny ever claiming that the rented children were Archie and Lily, it would be an implausible defense.

She has frequently referred to them in press reports, as demonstrated by the swift response she and Harry issued following a statement from the late Queen.

Meghan's attempt to protect the identity of Archie and Lily by using other children is equally problematic.

It raises concerns about her disregard for the well-being of these substitute children, treating them as disposable.

The truth about Meghan and Harry's alleged rental children may come to light in a court of law if Gavin and Hartford, the real children behind the rented personas, sue their mothers and all those involved in this deception.

These innocent children will undoubtedly be impacted by the consequences of this elaborate scheme.

They have been wrongfully placed in the British line of succession without any rightful claim.

The absence of names accompanying the photos released by Meghan and Harry's sites does not absolve them of responsibility.

The implication was clear, especially when it came to events like Lily's birthday.

If it turns out that Meghan used other people's children to protect Archie and Lily, she has potentially put those children in harm's way.

It would be astonishing if Meghan and Harry actually have their own children, considering the inconsistencies surrounding the existence of these invisible children.

Moreover, toddlers cannot sign contracts, and even stunt doubles receive credit by name.

The mothers who allowed their children to be used in this manner must acknowledge their mistake.

Ignorance is not an excuse, as the truth has been widely reported.

Interfering with the British line of succession is a serious crime, and it is surprising that Harry and Meghan have not faced charges of high treason.

Their actions have betrayed the trust of the British people, who may question whether the royal family deserves their support, including taxpayer-funded privileges.

Honesty and transparency are essential for the monarchy to maintain public support.

The ongoing charade orchestrated by Meghan and Harry, using their invisible children for personal gain, is simply unacceptable.

There are claims that Archie and Lily, if they do exist, suffer from various issues, such as developmental delays and withdrawal.

Such concerns warrant investigation, particularly if they are linked to one parent's narcissistic tendencies.

Additionally, there is speculation that Meghan might stage a kidnapping of the fake children to solicit donations.

This sickening idea would involve appealing for financial assistance under the pretense of being unable to pay the ransom demanded by the supposed kidnappers, whom Meghan would accuse of being associated with the royal family.

It is clear that the charade surrounding Archie and Lily cannot continue indefinitely.

The people of Britain and the Commonwealth are not fools, and the laws in place exist for a reason.

Interfering with the line of succession is a slap in the face to the British public.

If the royal family wishes to retain the support of its citizens, it must be honest and forthcoming about what they are supporting.

The truth will eventually prevail, and those responsible for this elaborate deception will face the consequences.

It is a despicable form of child abuse to exploit one's own children as rented props.

Hopefully, the day will come when Gavin and Hartford can reclaim their true identities and put an end to this deceit.