Sussex Faces Backlash for Actions Following King’s Health Concerns

The actions of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have come under fire as they were criticized for their recent public appearance with Jamaica's Prime Minister amidst health issues within the royal family.

The couple's decision to pose with the Prime Minister, who has expressed intentions to abolish the monarchy and has made it clear that William and Kate will not ascend to the throne in his country, has raised eyebrows.

At a time when King Charles III is scheduled for prostate treatment, Princess Kate is recovering from abdominal surgery, and Sarah Ferguson has revealed her battle with malignant melanoma, concerns have been raised about who will step in to fulfill their royal duties.

Omid Scobie, a prominent figure supporting the Sussexes, highlighted the stark contrast between the recent interaction with the Jamaican PM and his previous statements about abolishing the monarchy to Prince William and Kate earlier this year.

Criticism of Prince Harry and Meghan's choice not to address the ongoing royal health issues during their appearance in Jamaica has been voiced by Mike Parry on GB News.

Parry expressed his disapproval of the couple's engagement at the premiere of a Bob Marley biopic, suggesting that they are engaging in activities to fill their time rather than focusing on more pressing matters.

Royal commentator Phil Dampier conveyed his disappointment with Harry and Meghan's seeming lack of sensitivity towards the royal family's current situation.

Dampier pointed out that while it is common for the royals to attend public events, the timing of their appearance in Jamaica, given the circumstances surrounding King Charles' health and Jamaica's stance on the monarchy, was deemed inappropriate.

The absence of public support for the royal family during this challenging period has not gone unnoticed.

A source close to the Palace Insider revealed that there are speculations that Harry and Meghan's recent actions are motivated by a desire for revenge against King Charles for allegedly blocking Harry from assuming a royal role during his surgery.

Despite Harry's status as a royal councillor of state, reports suggest that he has been excluded from the list of potential stand-ins due to his current non-working royal status.

The Times of London reported a statement by Lord True, confirming that only working members of the royal family would be called upon to serve as councillors of state, effectively ruling out Prince Harry and Prince Andrew from fulfilling such roles.

Royal expert Dickie Arbiter commended this decision as practical and sensible, emphasizing the importance of having active members of the royal family available to step in during times of need.