Must Read
Spotify Exec Slams Meghan Markle and Prince Harry as De-Facto Charlatans
Bill Simmons, the International Sports Content Head at Spotify, did not hold back in his recent podcast when he labeled Meghan Markle and Prince Harry as de-facto charlatans.
He expressed his belief that the couple contributed little to nothing during their time with the streaming platform.
Simmons openly mocked the duo, stating, “…the grifters.
That's the podcast we should have launched with them.”
Furthermore, he criticized Meghan and Harry, branding them as lazy individuals.
Following Simmons' scathing remarks, other media personalities have joined in on the criticism directed at the royal couple.
Royal Correspondent Kinsey Schofield, speaking on GB News, speculated that Markle might pivot towards becoming an online influencer as a means of income.
This prediction stems from the cancellation of their Spotify deal and reported challenges with their Netflix ventures.
Political broadcaster and commentator Sam Dowler shed light on interactions he had heard of between Meghan and Harry and potential content collaborators.
According to Dowler, feedback provided to the couple was met with skepticism, as their proposed content ideas were deemed uninteresting and out of touch.
Dowler suggested that Meghan's desire for strict control over her public image may have hindered their creative direction.
In a separate critique, Stephen A. Smith took aim at Meghan and Harry's abrupt departure from Spotify after just 12 episodes of their podcast, despite a lucrative $20 million deal.
Smith dismissed their short-lived podcast venture, emphasizing his ability to produce a similar number of episodes effortlessly.
He also referenced Bill Simmons' scathing comments, acknowledging Simmons' standing within the industry.
Smith defended Simmons' characterization of Meghan and Harry as grifters, highlighting the term's meaning as con artists who deceive others for financial gain.
While acknowledging Simmons' expertise as an executive at Spotify, Smith expressed some reservations about the harshness of the criticism.
However, he conceded that Simmons likely possessed insider knowledge that justified his pointed remarks.
Simmons' outspoken criticism of the royal couple is not new, as he had previously chastised Prince Harry while the latter was still under contract with Spotify.
In one instance, Simmons expressed his embarrassment at being associated with the same company as Harry.
He derided Harry's contributions, questioning the relevance of his public statements and activities, particularly his focus on criticizing the royal family.
Simmons' blunt assessment of Meghan and Harry reflects a broader sentiment within certain circles regarding the couple's post-royal endeavors.
The scrutiny they face extends beyond mere entertainment industry dynamics, touching on perceptions of their work ethic, authenticity, and overall impact.
As public figures navigating a transition away from traditional royal duties, Meghan and Harry continue to encounter both support and skepticism in their new ventures.