Royal Dilemma: Meghan Markle’s Absence Linked to Security Concerns

Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, would have refrained from accompanying her husband, Prince Harry, to the UK for a significant event due to a crucial reason, as indicated by a royal expert.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are facing a major hurdle that needs resolution before Meghan Markle considers returning to the United Kingdom.

This revelation comes amidst the buzz surrounding the absence of the royal couple at the recent wedding of the Duke of Westminster.

In an exclusive report by Royal Unlock, it was disclosed that Meghan Markle's decision not to partake in the festivities revolving around the nuptials of Hugh Grosvenor and Olivia Henson was primarily influenced by security concerns.

Despite the invitation extended to them, the Duke and Duchess opted to skip the grand affair in Chester, where Prince William, Harry's elder brother, is set to play a significant role as an usher at the ceremony.

The guest list for the opulent event boasts around 400 attendees, including prominent figures such as Prince William, who shares a close bond with Hugh Grosvenor.

Notably, the Duke of Westminster holds the distinction of being named the wealthiest individual under 40 in Britain, with both Harry and William entrusting him with the role of godfather to their respective children, Prince Archie and Prince George.

Sources close to the royal family revealed that Harry and Hugh mutually agreed that it would be best for the Duke of Sussex to forgo attending the wedding.

However, it has been underscored that even if Prince Harry had decided otherwise, Meghan Markle would have refrained from joining him on the trip, citing unresolved security issues as the primary deterrent.

Addressing the ongoing speculation surrounding Meghan and Harry's future plans, Hannah Furness, the royal editor at The Telegraph, emphasized the prevailing narrative that suggests the Duchess and their children will not return to the UK until the security concerns are adequately addressed to their satisfaction.

Furness highlighted this critical aspect during her appearance on Hello's A Right Royal podcast.

The crux of the matter lies in a legal dispute initiated by Prince Harry against the Home Office following a decision made by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (REVEC) in February 2020.

The ruling stipulated a revised level of taxpayer-funded protection for the Duke when in the country, citing his altered status post his transition away from full-time royal duties.

In a comprehensive 52-page ruling delivered by retired High Court judge Sir Peter Lane in February, Harry's plea was dismissed, with the judge asserting that REVEC's decision-making process was neither irrational nor procedurally unfair.

Prior to this legal setback, Prince Harry had expressed profound disappointment at the necessity of stepping back from his royal role and leaving the UK, emphasizing the importance of ensuring the safety of his family while on British soil.