Proof Emerges of King Charles Being Photoshopped in Harry and Archie’s Christening Photo

A recent christening photo of baby Archie has sparked intense speculation on Twitter, with many users suggesting that the image has been heavily edited.

The focal point of discussion revolves around a noticeable gap in the middle of the picture, leaving people puzzled about its origin.

Renowned body language expert Judy James has weighed in on the matter, noting that Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, appears ready to make a quick exit, while Prince William adopts a protective stance akin to that of a nightclub bouncer.

However, these observations fail to explain the conspicuous absence of a person in half of the photo.

Upon closer examination, Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, appears visibly horrified, resembling a mother pleading with her baby not to soil her pristine white Dior dress with an overflowing mess.

The image in question was chosen by Meghan and her husband, Prince Harry, to commemorate King Charles' 71st birthday.

It features Archie dressed in his baptism robes, cradled by his proud father, while King Charles stands beside them, gazing lovingly at his grandson.

The photograph was shared on the couple's Instagram account, accompanied by the message “Happy Birthday to His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales Sir Pa Grandpa,” followed by a birthday cake emoji.

It was taken by photographer Chris Allerton during Archie's christening in July.

However, some social media theorists have raised doubts about the authenticity of the image, asserting that King Charles may have been digitally added.

They point to his attire, noting that he is wearing the exact same suit, pocket square, and purple buttonhole flower as seen in Prince Louis' baptism photos.

This intriguing similarity has prompted further investigation.

Interestingly, Archie's christening photos bear striking resemblances to those of Prince Louis.

Both occasions share common elements, such as the absence of Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip from the official portraits.

Additionally, the composition of the photos is remarkably similar, with the closest relatives positioned at the sides.

In Prince Louis' family portrait, the Waleses were flanked by Prince Harry and Meghan, King Charles, and Queen Camilla.

On Catherine's side, her parents, Carol and Mike Middleton, stood alongside Pippa Middleton, her husband James Matthews, and her brother James Middleton.

Similarly, Archie's portrait showcases only the immediate family members of his parents.

Prince Harry's side includes Charles, Camilla, William, and Catherine, while Meghan is supported by her mother, Doria Ragland.

In a touching tribute to Prince Harry's late mother, Princess Diana, her sisters Lady Jane Fellows and Lady Sarah McCorquodale are also present.

These observations have led some Twitter users to question whether any members of the royal family have ever been seen holding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's children.

Speculation about photoshopped images of Archie and Lilibet has been rampant, with one user expressing surprise at the absence of other family members in the christening photos.

They claimed that none of them had been photographed holding the babies, suggesting a hidden narrative.

In a more controversial tweet, another user went as far as to claim that Meghan Markle never gave birth to Archie or Lilibet.

The user labeled Markle a fraud who allegedly used racism as a means to manipulate the royal family and secure two children in the line of succession.

This assertion was accompanied by videos purporting to show Meghan's supposedly square bump.

As the debate rages on social media, the authenticity of the christening photo remains in question.