Princess Eugenie’s Surprise Birth: A Twist in the Royal Family

Princess Eugenie, cousin of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, recently announced the birth of her baby boy, Ernest George Ronnie Brooksbank.

However, there seems to be some confusion surrounding the actual date of birth.

While Meghan's PR team initially stated that Princess Eugenie gave birth on June 4th, Eugenie herself revealed that her son was born on May 30th, just last week.

Interestingly, all the working royals, including Prince Andrew and Fergie, were aware of the correct birth date and had been sworn to secrecy.

On the other hand, Harry and Meghan were only informed about the birth itself, without any details regarding the timing or gender of the baby.

The message they received simply conveyed that the baby and mother were doing well.

So, where did the false reports of Princess Eugenie giving birth on June 4th originate?

According to sources, it was Meghan's agency that spread this misinformation.

Although Meghan had no concrete information about Eugenie's child, she wanted to maintain a connection with Harry's cousin and demonstrate that the Sussexes and Princess Eugenie were still close.

As a result, Meghan's PR team released a statement claiming that Eugenie's baby shared the same birthday as their own child.

This was a test to see if Harry and Eugenie would leak the information, and they fell right into the trap.

Now, Princess Eugenie has evidence that a beloved cousin leaked stories about her.

This revelation adds to previous rumors that Meghan announced her first pregnancy to divert attention from Eugenie's wedding.

However, despite Meghan's efforts, Eugenie managed to shine on her special day.

Now, the birth of Eugenie's baby threatens to overshadow Princess Lilibet's second birthday, which took place last week.

Both King Charles and Princess Eugenie hope that Eugenie's new baby will be born on a different day in the future, to prevent any attempts by the Harkles (Harry and Meghan) to gatecrash the celebrations.

In fact, King Charles had to restrict the palace announcements about Eugenie's baby to a select few members of the royal family, using some excuse, in order to counter any promotion by the Harkles.

It is clear that the palace is facing numerous challenges diplomatically due to the actions of Harry and Meghan.

Similar to how Catherine (Duchess of Cambridge) was overshadowed by Meghan during Queen Elizabeth's funeral, measures have had to be taken to protect the innocent parties involved.

The Markles cannot be considered innocent in these situations.

Earlier, when the news of Eugenie's impending arrival was leaked by Fergie, Meghan released a PR article to address the issue.

The post highlighted the sweet connection between Princess Eugenie's unborn baby and their cousin, Princess Lilibet, who had just turned two.

It was stated that both babies would share the same star sign as they were born in June.

However, with Eugenie's recent announcement clarifying the actual birth date, it becomes necessary for all those articles claiming a shared birthday to be retracted.

It would be particularly satisfying if those articles were actually paid puff pieces funded by Meghan herself.

In the end, the Harkles were not informed about the exact arrival date of Eugenie's baby, only that the baby had indeed arrived.