Prince Harry’s Witness Statement Raises Questions in Phone Hacking Case

Prince Harry's highly anticipated witness statement in his phone hacking case against the publishers of the Daily Mirror has been made public.

The 55-page document, consisting of 25,538 words, contains crucial evidence that the royal is using to support his claims against the media outlet.

However, upon closer inspection, it becomes apparent that certain details are missing.

While the statement includes the full date of Prince Harry's own birth, it only mentions the month and year of his children's births, his wedding, and the year he met Meghan.

This omission immediately caught the attention of the judge presiding over the case.

Why did Prince Harry not include the full dates of his children's births?

Could it be because they never disclosed the truth about the actual dates?

Or perhaps they have their own private celebrations for these occasions?

Similarly, the absence of the exact wedding date raises questions about Meghan's previous claim that they married earlier than the publicized ceremony.

Did Prince Harry intentionally avoid contradicting her statement?

During the court proceedings, the judge directly asked Prince Harry about the dates of his children's births.

However, he refused to provide specific details, citing the need for truthfulness in his witness statement under the penalty of perjury.

This puts Prince Harry in a difficult position, as revealing more information could potentially expose further inconsistencies in his claims.

It appears that he is concealing something significant, and divulging additional details would only shed light on his alleged lies.

It is evident that Prince Harry wants to avoid perjuring himself by including false birth dates of his children in the court documents.

Perhaps he genuinely cannot recall the exact dates, or he fears inadvertently providing inaccurate information.

It is unclear how Meghan or others may have assisted him in filling these memory gaps.

However, the absence of definitive dates for these significant life events raises doubts about the credibility of Prince Harry's claims.

Returning to court for his second and final day of giving evidence, Prince Harry entered the witness box with a sense of determination.

He performed a brief neck roll, took a sip of water, and mentally prepared himself for the challenging ordeal ahead.

It seemed as though he had been advised overnight to respond to questions with simple yes or no answers and to adhere strictly to the prepared script.

In his witness statement, Prince Harry portrays himself as a champion of journalism and a defender of important values.

It would be disheartening to discover that his motivations were influenced by less noble intentions.

However, despite his professed dedication, Prince Harry frequently deviated from the immediate subject matter, opting instead to delve into broader grievances and personal struggles.

This offered a glimpse into the unique challenges he faces in his sheltered existence, burdened by suspicion and privilege.

He expressed wariness towards everyone, relying on individuals he referred to as “my security,” “my point person,” and even “my police.”

As the phone hacking case continues, the public eagerly awaits further developments.

The contradictions and uncertainties surrounding the dates of significant life events raise doubts about the veracity of Prince Harry's claims.

Will the court uncover the truth behind these discrepancies?

Only time will tell as this high-profile case unfolds.