Prince Harry’s Hair Transformation Over the Years: A Closer Look

Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, has been in the public eye since his teenage years.

Throughout his journey, many have speculated about his hairline and whether he has undergone a hair transplant.

Today, we will delve into Prince Harry's hair evolution and provide an update from a recent video he released this month.

In 2002, at the age of 19, Prince Harry's temples aligned perfectly with the lateral aspect of his eyebrows, showcasing a youthful appearance.

Notably, his crown hair was strong and robust, indicating a healthy head of hair.

However, as time went on, changes became apparent.

By 2003, at the age of 20, Prince Harry's low hairline made his upper third of the face appear shorter compared to the lower third.

This unique feature also framed his face beautifully.

The following year, in 2004, at the age of 21, Prince Harry sported a great hairline for his age.

However, this particular hairline configuration may not be suitable for older individuals seeking hair transplants.

Moving forward to 2005, at the age of 22, Prince Harry displayed a widow's peak, a common trait found in approximately 30 percent of men and women.

The term “widow's peak” refers to the beak or bill of a headdress that widows wore as a hood of mourning dating back to 1530.

In 2006, at the age of 23, early signs of right temple thinning were noticeable.

It is worth mentioning that the right side of the temple or frontotemporal angle tends to be thinner and more recessed in most individuals, though the exact reason for this remains unclear.

As the years progressed, Prince Harry's hairline continued to change.

In 2007, at the age of 24, the shape of his hairline appeared less flat and straight, with the corners starting to develop.

By 2010, at the age of 27, his temples had receded, resulting in increased forehead height, yet he maintained a positive outlook.

In 2012, at the age of 29, crown loss became more evident.

Understanding the basic anatomy of the scalp is crucial when discussing hair restoration.

The hairline frames the face, extending from the temples to the central hairline.

There's the frontal scalp, mid-scalp, and crown.

The donor area typically consists of the occipital and parietal scalp, commonly used for both transplantation and as the recipient area.

By 2013, at the age of 30, density differences between the DHT sensitive and resistant zones were noticeable.

This is an ideal time to consider medical therapy, such as finasteride and minoxidil, which have proven effective for many individuals.

It is recommended to start medical therapy when early signs of thinning become apparent.

In 2014, at the age of 31, there was increased depth in the frontotemporal corners.

It is worth noting that relying solely on the Norwood scale, a classification system for hair loss, may not accurately reflect an individual's specific pattern of hair loss.

Each person's hair loss pattern is unique and requires a personalized approach.

As we reach 2015, at the age of 32, slight weakening of the right anterior temporal peak became noticeable.

This signifies the beginning stages of temple recession.

When rebuilding the hairline, grafts can be invested to enhance the temples, providing a more comprehensive hair restoration.

In 2016, at the age of 33, Prince Harry's crown loss appeared to worsen, leading to speculation that he may have undergone a hair transplant in 2017, around the age of 34.

The procedure likely involved 1200 to 1800 grafts, focusing on the hairline and frontal scalp.

It is important to note that our clinic boasts over 60 years of combined hair transplant experience, ensuring top-quality results for our patients.

By 2018, at the age of 35, the results of Prince Harry's potential hair transplant became more evident, with a natural-looking hairline.

However, his crown loss continued to progress.

In 2019, his hair started thinning further, possibly due to discontinuing medical therapy or experiencing side effects from it.

Various forms of medical therapy, such as low-level laser light therapy, platelet-rich plasma, and microneedling, can be considered alongside finasteride and minoxidil.

If standard doses of finasteride do not yield desired results, switching to brand name Propecia or dutasteride may be explored.

However, it is crucial to weigh the potential side effects of stronger medications like dutasteride against their effectiveness.

In 2022, at the age of 38, differences in coloration between transplanted grafts and pre-existing hairs became apparent at Prince Harry's hairline.

This phenomenon occurs when hair is relocated from an area with slightly different coloration.

Despite potential future hair transplants, achieving the original density is unlikely due to limited donor hair availability.

As we approach 2023, Prince Harry's hair density has significantly decreased.

Approximately 30 to 40 percent of his original hair density remains in the frontal scalp, while the mid-scalp and crown show only 15 to 20 percent density.

It is essential to manage expectations when considering hair transplant surgery, as complete restoration to an individual's youthful appearance is often unattainable.

Additional procedures may be necessary to increase density over time.

During a call related to his foundation in August 2023, Prince Harry's shorter haircut revealed a potentially visible FUT (follicular unit transplantation) scar on the occipital scalp.

While FUE (follicular unit extraction) hair transplants are more popular worldwide, there is still a role for FUT surgery.

Understanding the differences between these procedures is crucial when exploring hair transplant options.

In conclusion, Prince Harry's hair transformation has been a topic of interest for many.

While there is speculation about potential hair transplants, it is essential to approach such discussions with realistic expectations.

Hair restoration treatments and surgeries can provide significant improvements, but complete restoration to an individual's original density is often not feasible.