Prince Harry’s Attendance at Coronation Sparks Heated Debate

Prince Harry's decision to attend King Charles' coronation on May 6th has ignited a fiery debate, with critics accusing him of attempting to undermine the Roar family.

While his wife, Meghan Markle, remains in Montecito with their children, Lilibet and Archie, Harry's attendance has drawn the ire of GB News host Dan Wooten, who believes that Charles should not have extended an invitation to the U.S.-based royal.

During a recent segment called The Clash, Wooten engaged in a heated discussion with broadcaster Joanna Juak and role expert Ingrid Seward.

The focus of the conversation quickly shifted towards Meghan, prompting Wooten to express his frustration.

He criticized Harry for betraying his own family by divulging private conversations with his father shortly after Prince Philip's funeral.

Wooten's criticism stems from his belief that Harry's presence at the coronation is an attempt to reconcile with the family he previously sought to destroy.

In response to Wooten's comments, Juak raised an important question: why is Meghan constantly in the spotlight?

She argued that most of the attention and criticism is directed towards Meghan, yet Harry is the one facing calls to stay away from the coronation.

Juak emphasized the need to shift the focus onto the person who will undoubtedly attract the most attention from the royals.

The announcement of Harry's attendance at the coronation came from Buckingham Palace earlier this week.

This will be his first royal appearance since the release of his memoir, “Spare.”

In this revealing book, Harry made controversial claims about Camilla, the Queen Consort, describing her as dangerous.

He also expressed doubts about his father's readiness for parenthood, suggesting that Charles lacked the necessary qualities such as responsibility, patience, and time.

These assertions have put Charles in a difficult position, particularly in his relationship with Camilla.

Andrew Lowney, the author of “Traitor King: The Scandalous Exile of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor,” has voiced his opinion on the matter.

Lowney believes that Harry should be excluded from the coronation celebrations, describing him as a lost cause who should be cut loose.

According to Lowney, the couple's brand has already been tarnished, and their behavior aligns with their established character.

He also suggests that Harry and Meghan's public image in Britain may have been negatively impacted by the release of “Spare.”

The news of Harry's attendance at the coronation has stirred up a range of opinions.

What are your thoughts on this development?

Share your views in the comments section, and stay tuned for more updates on Royal News and Analysis.