Prince Harry Stunned Over Security Row: Expert Criticizes Exclusion from VIP Category

Prince Harry finds himself embroiled in a security row that has left him shocked at being excluded from the VIP category, according to recent reports.

The prince, who has been at odds with the UK government over his protection detail, was recently granted permission to appeal a court case he lost against the Home Office.

This legal battle stems from the downgrade in his security after stepping down as a senior royal in 2020.

Royal expert Angela Levin has criticized Prince Harry, suggesting that he is struggling to come to terms with the fact that he no longer enjoys the privileges of being classified as a VIP.

Levin highlighted that one of the reasons behind Harry's decision to appeal the court ruling was his upcoming world tour with Meghan, emphasizing his desire to shape the image of the royal family.

She noted that the issue of taxpayers funding his security was a contentious point, indicating a disconnect between the prince's expectations and reality.

Despite Prince Harry's efforts to expedite the appeal process by requesting a hearing before the end of July, his plea was denied.

Levin pointed out the irony of British taxpayers contributing to his security while questioning his entitlement to state protection.

The prince's position was further scrutinized when a judge previously determined that he did not qualify for the same level of security as other prominent figures entitled to state protection.

In response to the ongoing controversy, a spokesperson for Prince Harry has been approached for a statement.

The Duke's legal battle dates back to February 2020 when RAFique, the body responsible for royal and public figure protection, decided to provide him with a different security arrangement than other members of the royal family.

Despite a ruling earlier this year upholding the decision, Prince Harry has been granted the opportunity to challenge it in the Court of Appeal.

High Court Judge Peter Lane dismissed Harry's initial claims of unfair treatment, affirming the legality of the Home Office and RAFique's decision.

However, a recent order from Lord Justice Benn has paved the way for the prince to contest the ruling.

Sir Peter emphasized the validity of the security protocols established by RAFique, underscoring the importance of a fair and consistent application of security measures.

The intricate web of security arrangements for the royal family, overseen by RAFique and the Home Office, has faced scrutiny amidst Prince Harry's legal battle.

The Duke's plea for equitable treatment under RAFique's policies underscores his commitment to upholding the same standards as others in similar positions.

His quest for justice through the Court of Appeal reflects a determination to address the perceived discrepancies in his security assessment.

As the legal saga unfolds, Prince Harry remains resolute in seeking a resolution that aligns with his expectations of fairness and transparency.

The ongoing dispute highlights the complexities of balancing security protocols with individual entitlements, raising pertinent questions about the intricacies of royal protection.

Amidst the uncertainties surrounding his security status, Prince Harry's pursuit of justice underscores his unwavering commitment to upholding his rights within the realm of royal obligations.