Prince Harry Makes Glaring Error in Court Testimony, Insults the King

Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, found himself in hot water as he submitted a witness statement as part of his ongoing legal battle against Mirror Group newspapers.

Today, he appeared at the High Court in London to testify against MGM in a phone hacking case.

However, it was a glaring error in his statement that caught everyone's attention.

In the 55-page document released on Tuesday, Prince Harry referred to his father as “His Royal Highness King Charles III.”

While this may seem like a minor mistake, the correct title should have been “His Majesty King Charles III.”

As a member of the royal family, it is surprising that the Duke of Sussex would make such an oversight.

This slip-up was seen as a deliberate insult, suggesting that he purposely forgot his father's ascension to the throne.

Furthermore, Prince Harry's repeated use of the term “institution” instead of “my family” or “our security office” raised eyebrows.

It appeared to be a calculated move to portray the royal family and their security operations as a cold and lifeless entity, disregarding his own emotions and concerns.

ITV's royal editor, Chris Shipp, took to Twitter to highlight Prince Harry's mistake, stating, “Minor in the scheme of things, but odd no one proofreading the witness statement picked up that hashtag Prince Harry referred to his father as His Royal Highness King Charles rather than His Majesty King Charles.”

But that was not the only surprise during yesterday's court proceedings.

Rumors surrounding Princess Diana's lover, James Hewitt, being Prince Harry's biological father were also brought up.

In an extraordinary attack on the government, Prince Harry addressed these rumors and expressed his fear that he might not be an actual prince when the rumors surfaced at the age of 18.

However, he later discovered that the affair between Hewitt and Princess Diana started two years after his birth.

This revelation left him questioning his own paternity for a staggering 12 years.

Many have questioned why Prince Harry didn't seek validation from the royal family during this time.

After all, as a prince in the UK succession, one would assume that he could have turned to a member of the royal household or even demanded a DNA test from Hewitt or his father, Prince Charles.

Instead, he quietly wrestled with his origin story, seemingly more concerned about preserving his privileged position than finding the truth.

This revelation has led some royal fans to question whether Prince Harry should be removed from the line of succession altogether.

They argue that his statement about Hewitt being his father is unrelated to the hacking lawsuit and has no relevance to the case at hand.

It seems that Prince Harry has veered off-topic, focusing on personal matters rather than the core issue of the trial.

As the court case continues, the public awaits further developments and wonders how this will impact Prince Harry's relationship with his family and his position within the royal hierarchy.

It remains to be seen whether his actions and statements will have any lasting consequences.