Must Read
Prince Harry Faces Lawsuit Over Immigration Status and Alleged Drug Use
The Duke of Sussex, Prince Harry, is facing a lawsuit filed by Oversight PR over his immigration status and alleged drug use.
In a recent update from Niall Gardner, it has been revealed that a new motion has been filed in the DC Federal Court.
The motion aims to compel US Customs and Border Protection and US Citizenship and Immigration Services to respond more promptly to a request concerning Prince Harry's immigration status, considering his alleged drug use.
The Department of Homeland Security has been sued by the Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project for Prince Harry's immigration records.
The organization seeks information from government authorities regarding whether the Duke of Sussex received preferential treatment from the US government.
It has been reported that Prince Harry openly admitted to being a frequent drug user in his book, “Spare.”
The organization argues that under US immigration law, individuals who admit to a crime are not allowed entry, except on a temporary basis with a waiver.
The lawsuit aims to uncover records that would determine whether Prince Harry received preferential treatment during his immigration process.
Rumors have circulated suggesting that Prince Harry used a fake A1 visa to deceive the authorities and immigrate to the United States.
According to a source, if he entered the country with an A or A1 visa, it is likely that he wouldn't have faced questioning, regardless of his drug use.
Furthermore, individuals holding an A or A1 visa can consume illegal substances in the US without being charged with a crime.
However, it remains unclear why Prince Harry possesses an A1 visa when the Canadian government announced that he had lost his IPP (Internationally Protected Person) status in March 2020, following the implementation of Megxit.
This was when Harry was informed that he would be responsible for his own security arrangements.
If the late Queen's government stripped Prince Harry, Meghan, and Archie of their IPP status, it seems reasonable to assume that they would have also revoked any A1 diplomatic visa he may have previously held.
Given Prince Harry's questionable behavior in the past, it is concerning that he may misuse the privileges and protections associated with an A1 visa while no longer working for the monarchy, potentially causing an international incident.
The Heritage Foundation has also criticized the Department of Homeland Security's refusal to respond to their lawful FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request, deeming it laughable.
They argue that Prince Harry cannot claim privacy rights regarding his drug use when he openly wrote about it in his book.
The Oversight Project asserts that this lawsuit is not solely about Prince Harry personally but rather about addressing significant media inquiries regarding whether the Department of Homeland Security acted appropriately in a highly publicized and unusual case.
In other news, the High Court has heard that Prince Harry has failed to present sufficient evidence of phone hacking in his case against the publisher of the Daily Mirror.
Andrew Green KC, the lawyer representing Mirror Group, argued that there was little to no evidence supporting Harry's allegations of phone hacking.