Piers Morgan Exposes Contradictions in Meghan’s Claims and Questions Leaking of Correspondence

In a fiery talk show segment, renowned TV presenter Piers Morgan delved into Meghan Markle's discussion about alleged comments made by the royal family regarding Archie's complexion during her and Prince Harry's interview with Oprah Winfrey.

Morgan scrutinized the use of terms like “unconscious bias” versus outright discrimination, labeling Omid Scobie, co-author of the controversial book “Endgame,” as a shameless liar.

He also dissected the inconsistencies in the author's explanation of the “translate gate” scandal and didn't hold back in criticizing Prince Harry, whom he referred to as a dimwit.

Morgan further raised questions about Meghan and Harry's continued silence concerning the discrimination allegations, as well as the leaking of private correspondence with both her father and Prince Charles.

He even pondered whether Scobie could be the couple's source for such information.

According to Scobie, Meghan had written letters to Prince Charles, naming the two royals involved in the troubling conversations about Archie's complexion.

Morgan initially revealed the names of these individuals during his evening show on Wednesday.

During another show last night, Morgan staunchly defended his decision to disclose the names, subsequently branding Scobie a proven liar.

He accused Scobie of dragging the royal family through the mud once again, solely to boost book sales and make money.

In response to Scobie's claim of frustration, Morgan took to Twitter, pointing out that the Dutch edition of the book supposedly includes the names of the two royals, yet fails to provide any details regarding the alleged conversations.

Scobie has not presented any evidence to support his claims.

Moreover, Morgan vehemently refuted Scobie's accusations that he had called for Meghan Markle and Prince Harry to be burned alive.

While unsure about British libel laws, Morgan contended that it would be Scobie, not himself, who would face legal consequences for his statements.

By publicly naming the individuals mentioned in Scobie's book, Morgan strategically shifted the focus onto himself rather than the author.

This move aims to garner more publicity for Morgan while undermining Scobie's credibility.

Morgan is counting on the fact that narcissists react when their egos are damaged, and he hopes to provoke Meghan into a response that he can use against her.

It's a strategic chess move.

Meanwhile, Scobie faced scrutiny following a live television interview where he discussed the inclusion of Prince Harry and Meghan in his new book, “Endgame.”

The controversial book delves into the royal household's relationship with the press and alleged infighting within the royal family.

Newspaper reviews of “Endgame” have highlighted its pro-Harry and Meghan narrative while heavily criticizing working members of the royal family.

During an interview on ITV's “This Morning,” Scobie became increasingly frustrated by presenter Craig Dawes' tough questioning.

In response, Scobie pointed out that Prince Harry is first mentioned on page 3 of the prologue, followed by Meghan on page 9.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are then frequently mentioned throughout the book, generally portrayed in a positive light.

These revelations have raised doubts about the accuracy and reliability of Scobie's version of events.

A few days ago, Scobie boasted that he knew the names of the royals involved in the discriminatory conversations but refused to disclose them.

However, the names were subsequently leaked from Holland, prompting Scobie to accuse the entire press of being aware of the identities.

This sudden change in stance raises eyebrows, as it implies that initially, only Scobie possessed the truth, but later, all UK journalists were privy to the same information.

Such contradictions leave us questioning the veracity of Scobie's claims.

Piers Morgan's decision to reveal the names and put an end to the absurdity of the situation appears justified.

Scobie deserved the backlash, as did Meghan and Harry, if they were indeed Scobie's sources.