Oprah Orders Meghan to Pay Huge Compensation After False Claims on Air Ruin Her Career

Meghan Markle is facing a legal battle as her half-sister, Samantha Markle, sues her for defamation.

Samantha alleges that Meghan lied about her childhood during the tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey, which ultimately led to her reputation being tarnished.

The Duchess of Sussex denied these accusations and claims that her comments were subjective rather than factual.

Samantha is seeking £57,000 in damages, citing Meghan's statement about growing up as an only child during the prime-time program as evidence.

In addition, Samantha is pointing to the unofficial biography, “Finding Freedom,” written by Omid Scobie and Caroline Durand, which she believes further contributed to her humiliation and worldwide hatred.

However, both authors have denied any direct involvement from the Sussexes, a claim that has been challenged by loyal royal fans.

Meghan's legal team argues that her statement about her childhood was a subjective expression of her feelings and should not be considered defamatory.

They state that it is impossible to disprove someone's personal perception of their own upbringing.

Furthermore, Meghan's lawyers highlight the context in which the statement was made.

Oprah Winfrey specifically asked Meghan about her relationship with Samantha, referring to her as her half-sister on her father's side.

Meghan's response, stating that she grew up as an only child, was not intended to be an objective fact but rather a reflection of her personal experience.

Additionally, Meghan's legal team asserts that she cannot be held responsible for anything related to “Finding Freedom” since she did not write the book.

However, Samantha argues that Meghan may have had off-record conversations with the authors, making her liable for its content.

In other news, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle faced a significant setback within the royal family during the annual Commonwealth Day service at Westminster Abbey in 2020.

Author Tom Bauer discusses a pivotal argument that accelerated their decision to step back from their royal duties.

According to Bauer, the dispute arose when palace officials publicly humiliated Harry and Meghan by revoking their participation in the family's procession through Westminster Abbey.

Initially, the order of service listed Harry and Meghan walking behind the Queen, but palace officials changed their decision, fueling suspicions about the couple.

In response, Harry was informed that, as they had stepped down from their royal duties, he and Meghan would be seated with the congregation instead.

The prospect of being isolated and publicly displayed in the Abbey deeply troubled them.

As the legal battle continues between Meghan and Samantha, the repercussions of their ongoing feud and the impact on their relationship with the royal family remain uncertain.

The outcome of this case will undoubtedly shape Meghan's future and the public's perception of her.