Meghan Shocked as Samantha’s Bombshell Confirms Surrogacy for Archie After Miscarriage

In a shocking revelation, Samantha is currently suing Meghan, alleging that the Duchess of Sussex orchestrated a deliberate campaign to ruin her and her father's reputation.

This desperate attempt by Samantha to remain relevant comes at a time when she could potentially be banned from Twitter.

Last year, an analysis conducted by analytics firm Bot Sentinel revealed that Meghan had been the target of a coordinated harassment campaign on the platform.

The study found that 70% of the anti-Meghan content originated from just 83 accounts.

Now, BuzzFeed News has conducted its own investigation, which has uncovered that Samantha spearheaded the bullying campaign against Meghan.

According to the outlet, the 57-year-old utilized multiple accounts to spread damaging and potentially defamatory claims about her half-sister.

The investigation revealed numerous bizarre tweets from Samantha, including allegations that Meghan suffered a miscarriage during her first pregnancy and then opted for a secret surrogate to carry baby Archie.

Samantha also claimed that the surrogate was reluctant to hand over the child, leading Meghan to carry a doll during public appearances to maintain appearances.

“I believe the surrogate has not yet handed over the baby,” Samantha allegedly tweeted in June of last year.

“I think it should be mandatory that proof of delivery from my sister's womb be provided if any of the children are to have a title, and Archie should not have a title because I believe a surrogate was involved,” she continued.

Samantha further asserted that Meghan collected her eggs in Los Angeles, repeatedly emphasizing this claim in subsequent tweets.

Samantha went on to argue that this alleged surrogacy should prevent Meghan and Harry's children from receiving royal titles, despite the couple's previous statement expressing their desire for their children to have no titles.

“There is no DNA proof that he is Harry's son, and furthermore, there is no proof that Archie or Lily were delivered from the womb, which is a requirement for titles under British law,” Samantha asserted.

In addition to these claims, Samantha also accused Meghan of being involved with Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein, embracing nonsensical conspiracy theories.

Samantha's Twitter account has once again been suspended, and her lawyer, Douglas Kael, claims that his client was hacked by someone who coincidentally shares a hatred for Meghan and a love for wild conspiracy theories.

Kael is also representing Samantha in her lawsuit against Meghan, disputing the Duchess's statement that they were not particularly close during their childhood.

Kael argues that Samantha spent significant time with Meghan, picking her up from school, going out for ice cream and shopping regularly, and even spending holidays together.

Samantha is seeking $75,000 in damages, citing lost employment opportunities, lost income from her autobiography sales, emotional distress, and harm to her reputation and credibility due to threatening and violent messages she receives regularly.

In other news, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle found themselves the subject of protest during their presence at the United Nations headquarters in New York.

While attending the UN General Assembly on Monday, where Prince Harry delivered a keynote speech to commemorate Nelson Mandela International Day, a protester stood outside the building with a sign questioning their presence.

The sign read, “Mandela spent 27 years behind bars in S.A. Markle spent 18 months in castles and complained on TV during a pandemic.

Why are they here?”

Furthermore, during the event, Prince Harry and Meghan ignored a U.S. reporter's question about biographer Tom Bauer's new royal book, which contains a series of bombshell claims.

Despite these controversies, Meghan and Harry continue to make headlines as they navigate their post-royal lives and engage in various philanthropic endeavors.