Meghan Markle’s Struggle to Protect Archie from UK Media Scrutiny

Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has expressed her resentment towards sharing photos of her son Archie with UK media outlets during her time as a working royal.

In an interview with The Cut, the 41-year-old revealed that she was expected to provide images of her and Prince Harry's three-year-old son to the royal rota, a select group of media representatives covering events attended by Queen Elizabeth II and her family.

However, Meghan questioned the rationale behind granting access to individuals who had allegedly made racist remarks about her young son.

This revelation has sparked a heated debate, with critics arguing that Meghan has crossed a line and should simply remain silent.

They question the whereabouts of Archie, suggesting that he may be confined within one of the rooms, possibly the basement, of their supposed $16 million mansion.

Speculations arise that he will only be allowed to appear once he can speak, articulate praises for his deceased grandmother, and master the art of deception, just like his official parents.

In a recently published profile of Meghan Markle, her second child, Lilibet, is mentioned alongside a nanny.

The article describes Lilibet as small and ginger, taking after her father and older brother, Archie.

However, no pictures of these two supposedly invisible children have been released since the birthday photo months ago.

Adding to the controversy, Meghan's friend claimed they did not see Archie when visiting the Montecito mansion.

Furthermore, royal reporter Richard Palmer, known for his quick retorts, stated that photographers were attempting to capture images of Meghan while she dropped Archie off at school.

He dismissed Meghan's claim of a royal press pen with 40 photographers, citing that Prince William and Kate Middleton manage to drop off their children at school unnoticed on most days.

During the interview with The Cut, journalist Alison P. Davis reported Meghan's thoughts on her goals for a private life in Montecito.

Meghan expressed her concern that if Archie attended school in the UK, she would never be able to pick him up or drop him off without it turning into a photo opportunity for the royal family.

She firmly stated her objection to this, emphasizing that it does not stem from an obsession with privacy but rather from her desire to protect her child as a strong and caring parent.

Critics, however, believe that once the time is right and a substantial profit can be made, Archie will be released to contribute to his parents' luxurious lifestyle, most likely through lucrative deals with streaming giants like Netflix or Spotify.

Royal commentator Duncan Larcombe criticized Meghan's alleged plans to turn Archie and Lilibet into TV superstars, suggesting that Netflix would demand more than mundane footage of Prince Harry doing household chores.

Larcombe speculated that viewers would expect glimpses into the couple's real-life dynamics, including their arguments and disagreements.

The potential revelations from such filmed conversations and broadcasts could be significant.

Meghan Markle's struggle to shield Archie from media scrutiny has ignited a passionate debate about the boundaries between privacy and public interest.

As the world watches, the Duchess remains steadfast in her determination to protect her children from the prying eyes of the media, while critics question her motives and future plans for monetizing their lives.