Meghan Markle’s Secret: Archie’s Birth Certificate Raises Questions About His Parentage

In a surprising turn of events, it has been revealed that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are considering enrolling their children, Archie and Lilibet, in a private school in California.

This decision further solidifies their commitment to their new life in the United States and raises doubts about their return to the UK.

The news was exclusively disclosed by Richard Minyards, a former Fleet Street reporter turned gossip columnist for the Montecito Journal, the local newspaper in the Sussexes' neighborhood.

According to Minyards, Archie's application to public schools in the area was rejected due to unsatisfactory birth and immunization records provided by Meghan.

As a result, the couple is now exploring private school options.

It is worth noting that both public and private schools require specific documentation, including birth certificates and immunization records.

However, Archie's birth certificate raised eyebrows as Meghan had edited her own details just 11 days before submitting the documents to the school.

The education department discovered these irregularities and deemed the lack of supporting documents a reason for Archie's rejection.

Understandably, schools cannot risk enrolling students without proper documentation and immunization records, even for the prestigious private institutions that demand a hefty $50,000 fee.

The law applies to everyone, regardless of their royal status or privileges.

Meghan's claim that Archie's original birth certificate is sealed at the palace for security reasons appears dubious.

Birth certificates are public records and can be accessed by anyone who knows the name and date of birth.

The General Register Office in England and Wales maintains records of all births, deaths, and marriages since 1837.

There are two types of birth certificates: the short form, which provides limited information, and the long form, which includes detailed parental information.

The secrecy surrounding Archie's birth date has only fueled speculation.

However, it is crucial to note that providing incorrect information to the register is a criminal offense and considered perjury.

If Meghan's name appears on the birth certificate as the mother, it is legally binding.

Any changes made to the initial birth certificate would only occur if the child were adopted by different parents.

In such cases, an adoption certificate would be issued, indicating the adoptive parents' details and marking it as a record of adoption rather than birth.

While an adoption certificate would confirm the child's legal guardians, it does not provide information about their genetic parents or whether they carried the child.

Therefore, the existence of Archie's original birth certificate with Meghan's name suggests that she is indeed his mother.

The palace does not hold birth certificates under lock and key, as they are public records easily accessible to anyone.

The lingering question remains: What is Meghan hiding?

The inconsistencies and secrecy surrounding Archie's birth certificate raise doubts and fuel speculation about his true parentage.

However, until concrete evidence emerges, it is important to respect the privacy of the Sussexes and refrain from jumping to conclusions.

As they navigate their new life away from the royal spotlight, it is clear that Meghan and Harry are determined to protect their family's privacy and make choices that they believe are in the best interest of their children.