Meghan Markle’s Pregnancy Controversy: Was Archie Mountbatten-Windsor Really Born?

For years, rumors have swirled around Meghan Markle's pregnancy, with claims that she employed a surrogate to carry Archie and Lilibet.

Now, a certified midwife has come forward on Quora to shed light on the situation, raising doubts about whether Meghan actually gave birth to Archie at Portland Hospital in London.

The midwife, who disclosed her credentials as well as her anesthetist husband's expertise in epidural anesthesia, stated her disbelief in Meghan's birthing story.

According to her, Meghan was administered pain relief during labor, a fact confirmed by Harry in his book “Spare.”

The specific drug used was Entonox, commonly known as laughing gas, which Harry himself admitted to using.

Additionally, Meghan received oral or injected pain and relaxant medication.

Finally, a doctor arrived to administer an epidural, which numbs the lower body, including the legs.

It is possible that the epidural was topped up multiple times, and its effects can last for hours.

Based on these details, the midwife concludes that it would be impossible for any woman, as claimed, to walk out of the hospital just two hours after giving birth.

This casts doubt on the entire narrative surrounding Meghan's pregnancy, as many others have previously pointed out.

The air of mystery surrounding Archie's birth began with Meghan's ever-changing baby bump, which we will delve into later.

However, let's focus on Harry's perplexing comment about a child changing so much in the first two weeks.

This statement left many people puzzled.

Was Archie actually older than officially stated?

Unlikely, considering the birth certificate indicates his birthdate as May 6th.

Archie made his public debut two or three days later, leading to speculation about whether Harry's comment was a slip of the tongue or an accident.

It's worth noting that no footage of Meghan throwing a look at Harry during the press conference supports this claim.

Even Meghan's sister, Samantha Markle, has voiced skepticism about Archie's birth, alleging that Meghan used a surrogate.

Samantha went as far as claiming that the surrogate was reluctant to hand over the child, forcing Meghan to carry a doll during public appearances to maintain the illusion.

“I believe the surrogate has not yet handed over the baby,” Samantha allegedly tweeted.

She further questioned whether Archie should even have a title, suggesting that proof of delivery from Meghan's womb should be mandatory under British law.

Samantha also highlighted Meghan's changing stomach, citing photos that show it appearing large in the morning and flat by the end of the day.

According to her, Meghan picked up her eggs in Los Angeles before Archie's birth.

While Meghan and Harry have made it clear that they do not want their children to have royal titles, Samantha believes that the lack of DNA and delivery proof should prevent them from receiving any.

As the controversy surrounding Meghan Markle's pregnancy deepens, questions continue to arise about the veracity of Archie Mountbatten-Windsor's birth story.

With conflicting accounts and allegations from various sources, the truth remains elusive.

Only time will reveal the full extent of this perplexing saga.