### Meghan Markle’s Media Misadventures: A Birthday Blunder

When it comes to the world of Harry and Meghan, one can't help but wonder if any of their plans are ever truly thought through.

Meghan Markle, in particular, seems to have a knack for turning even the most well-intentioned endeavors into a spectacle of chaos.

A recent example?

Their much-anticipated interview on CBS's Sunday Morning, which was meant to highlight Meghan's latest charitable initiative.

Instead, it became another episode of “Meghan's Wild Ride,” complete with diva moments and behind-the-scenes turmoil that left many questioning whether anyone was steering the ship.

In a twist that would leave even seasoned media experts scratching their heads, Meghan appeared to believe that the show was hosted by Gayle King, Oprah's confidante.

The reality, however, is that it's helmed by Jane Pauley—a detail that seems to have slipped past Meghan's radar.

For someone who prides herself on being a savvy media figure, it's puzzling that she missed such a fundamental aspect of television programming.

It raises the question: how can one claim to master the media landscape while overlooking the basics?

But that wasn't the only misstep.

Meghan insisted on launching the interview on her birthday, as if the universe should pause to celebrate her special day.

CBS had other ideas, suggesting a fall release when audiences would be more likely to tune in post-summer.

Yet, Meghan's team was adamant about the timing, leading to a lackluster reception.

The result?

An interview that floundered, overshadowed by competing shows and failing to capture the audience's attention.

It turns out that throwing a birthday bash might not be the ideal backdrop for a media push, especially when aiming for a broader reach.

Adding to the absurdity, CBS had invested significantly in promoting this interview, banking on it being a pivotal moment.

However, due to Meghan's insistence on last-minute changes to the interview format, the network was forced to rely on clips rather than a full-scale promotional campaign.

It was almost as if Meghan and her crew were playing a game of self-sabotage.

The troubles don't end with this interview.

Meghan's philanthropic efforts, particularly through the Archul Foundation, have also faced criticism.

Once heralded as a beacon of charitable work, the foundation now appears to reflect a lack of genuine dedication on Meghan's part.

Reports suggest she spends less than an hour each week on its activities, raising eyebrows about the sincerity of her commitment to philanthropy.

Despite these ongoing challenges, Meghan seems perpetually surprised by the backlash she receives.

The interview didn't generate the headlines she was hoping for—perhaps because the public is more invested in pressing global matters than in Meghan's repetitive narratives.

Rather than adapting her approach based on feedback, she and her team seem to double down, demonstrating that they may be the only ones oblivious to the recipe for success in the theater of Meghan Markle's media career.

This latest endeavor serves as yet another reminder that high-stakes gambles often lead to disappointing outcomes.

Each attempt to reshape her public persona appears to devolve into another act of farce.