Meghan Markle’s Family Speaks Out: Insights and Emotions Revealed

In a recent interview with 7 News Spotlight, Thomas Markle, Samantha, and Thomas Jr. shared their side of the story, shedding light on the years of estrangement from Meghan.

As a behavior analyst, I couldn't help but observe their emotions through their body language, despite this being the Royal Rogues' territory.

While some may argue that the interview lacked new revelations, I beg to differ.

Join me as we delve into this emotional and pragmatic discussion, gaining fresh insights that can help us navigate similar situations in real life.

The emotional aspect of the interview was evident in Thomas Markle's pain over not being able to see his grandchildren.

He expressed his desire to sit down and talk with Meghan, saying, “Let's go somewhere and talk.

And I say, what's wrong?

How can I fix this?”

Despite his difficulty speaking due to a stroke, his pauses and head movements emphasized his points.

It seemed he felt responsible for how Meghan was treating him, possibly stemming from the paparazzi scandal before her wedding to Prince Harry.

However, contradictions arise when we consider Thomas' statements.

For instance, he mentioned having the letter Meghan wrote, claiming it was hateful and cruel.

Yet, he also stated that he would burn it rather than sell it for money.

This leads me to believe that Thomas has no ulterior motives and we can trust his claims to some extent.

Although there may be individuals willing to pay for the letter, it raises the question of what Meghan would gain by writing such a hurtful message to her father.

If we assume that the letter was indeed hateful and cruel, leaking it in its entirety would have been detrimental to Meghan's brand.

So why write it in the first place?

My theory is that Meghan may have written it in a neutral and cold tone, which Thomas interpreted as hateful due to their strained relationship.

It's perplexing, but it highlights the emotional side of this interview.

Thomas' limited facial expressions, likely a result of his stroke, make it challenging to gauge his feelings.

Nevertheless, his shoulder shrug and hesitant response when asked about Harry indicate that he holds no resentment towards his son-in-law.

However, it's clear that Harry cannot be the solution to mend the family's broken bonds.

Thomas had to accept that even a life-altering event like a stroke couldn't change Meghan's behavior towards him.

Now, let's turn our attention to Samantha, who offers her perspective on the Meghan riddle.

She suggests that Meghan has a pattern of cutting off people from her past to create a clean slate for her royal narrative.

Samantha believes that Meghan deemed her family unworthy and needed to inflate her own image to gain acceptance from the royals.

This self-glorification, according to Samantha, demonstrates a lack of empathy, remorse, or shame on Meghan's part.

Samantha's insights shed light on a possible motive for Meghan's actions.

Perhaps she felt the need to distance herself from her family to fit into her new royal role.

Samantha's conclusion is rooted in years of observation and firsthand knowledge of Meghan's relationship with their father.

It's a thought-provoking perspective that raises questions about the trigger for Meghan's abandonment.

Upon initial viewing of this interview, I've shared my observations and analysis.

I may revisit it for further insights in a future video.

In the meantime, I encourage you to share your thoughts in the comments section.

And don't forget, there's limited time to grab the Royal Rogues' exclusive merchandise for King Charles' coronation.

Much love and bliss to all my 109,000 Royal Rogues, and if you haven't already, remember to subscribe and like this video.