Meghan Markle’s Exploitative School Visit Sparks Outrage in America

Staff members have come forward, shedding light on Meghan Markle's unjust deduction of their salaries after they refused to treat her like royalty.

But what did it really look like for the half-in-half-out couple, Markle and Harry?

The answer lies in their recent visit to a school in New York, which has ignited anger among Americans.

Despite taking place in 2021, the true nature of the pair is now being exposed, thanks to documents released under the FOIA Act, as requested by the Daily Mail.

The visit had all the trappings of a royal affair, with the duo attempting to mimic the grandeur of a royal visit.

They shamelessly exploited their status as royalty in a country that lacks a monarchy, using taxpayer funds for their own commercial interests.

This week, the Princess of Wales visited a school in Kent, focusing on children with special needs.

Such visits are meant to bring attention to important causes, charities, and schools, shining a spotlight on them to garner support and appreciation.

We, as a nation, share compassion for our British royal family.

These visits are intended to help others and make them feel seen.

However, Markle took advantage of this practice to promote her book and merchandise her clothing line, solely for personal gain, commercial concerns, and self-promotion.

The concept of being half in and half out was a cynical and cheap plan that disregarded the noblesse oblige of the monarchy.

Markle acted as though Americans should bow and scrape to her, helping her earn money.

According to a source, Meghan cared more about her fame in North America than in Britain.

Former staff members have accused her of forcing them to treat her like the Queen of Hollywood, demanding unwavering loyalty and non-disclosure agreements during their employment with the Sussexes.

Failure to comply resulted in unjust deductions or fines.

This behavior mirrors how Markle forced students in New York to sign NDAs.

When it comes to monetizing her brand, Meghan Markle has shown no boundaries.

She will use anyone and anything to increase her popularity.

Shockingly, she even exploited deceased children in Yvaldi and children in Harlem to boost her image as an American royal.

Furthermore, her self-proclaimed feminist stance is nothing more than a facade.

She bullied female staff members at Kensington Palace, leading to numerous resignations among both male and female employees at Archwell.

This constant revolving door is unheard of with other royal staff members.

In contrast, Prince William and Catherine have kept the same nanny for nearly a decade, demonstrating stability and loyalty.

If one seeks a true feminist role model who isn't self-indulgent, look no further than Catherine, the Princess of Wales, Princess Anne, the Princess Royal, or even Zara Tindall and Sophie, the Duchess of Edinburgh.

These women do not flaunt their status to the point of being obnoxious.

Meghan Markle, on the other hand, has done nothing substantial for the feminist movement.

Instead, she has labeled other women to prop herself up as a champion of women's rights.

The charitable work she has undertaken thus far fails to demonstrate any genuine humanity.

In conclusion, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's visit to a school in New York has exposed their exploitative nature and disregard for the noblesse oblige of the monarchy.

Their attempt to mimic a royal visit for personal gain has sparked outrage among Americans.

It is clear that Markle's actions are driven by self-interest rather than a genuine commitment to charitable causes or feminism.