Meghan Markle’s Controversial Trademark Move Sparks Royal Tensions

In the latest chapter of royal family drama, Meghan Markle's choice to trademark her daughter's name, Lilibet, has ignited a firestorm of controversy.

Recent revelations suggest that this decision may have left the late Queen Elizabeth II feeling quite upset.

According to royal insiders, Markle had already secured the trademark for Lilibet before her daughter was even born, a move that has raised eyebrows and reignited discussions about the Sussexes' fraught relationship with the British monarchy.

These insights come from Robert Hardman's newly released book, Charles III: New King, New Court, which has been serialized by the Daily Mail.

The book unveils fresh details surrounding the Sussexes' naming choice, adding layers of tension to an already complicated narrative.

Royal biographer Angela Levin voiced her disapproval on GB News, labeling Markle's actions as “appalling.”

She emphasized that the trademarking of Lilibet was not just a business maneuver but a deeply personal affront to the Queen's legacy.

Levin elaborated on the emotional weight of the name Lilibet, explaining its significance to Queen Elizabeth II.

The nickname, a cherished term of endearment used by her family since childhood, originated from Elizabeth's early struggles with pronunciation.

Her grandfather, King George V, affectionately adopted the mispronunciation, and it became an intimate part of her identity, shared only with her closest relatives, including her late husband, Prince Philip.

Hardman's account reveals that the Queen was reportedly blindsided by the Sussexes' announcement.

An anonymous palace aide recounted that the Queen was visibly upset when the couple claimed she had approved the use of the name.

In a candid moment, she expressed her feelings to aides, stating, “I don't own the palaces or the paintings, only my name, and now they've taken that.” This poignant remark underscores the Queen's belief that her nickname was a treasured aspect of her personal history.

Confusion surrounded whether the Queen had actually been consulted before the name was announced.

While some reports suggested she felt obligated to agree, others, including the BBC, indicated that no formal permission was sought.

Buckingham Palace has remained tight-lipped on the matter, leaving the truth shrouded in ambiguity.

In the wake of the controversy, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex took legal action against media outlets reporting the Queen's alleged objections, claiming these narratives were false and defamatory.

Their spokesperson insisted that they had indeed discussed the name with the Queen, although the specifics of that conversation remain undisclosed.

The choice to use the name Lilibet, coupled with the trademark application, has intensified scrutiny regarding the Sussexes' intentions.

Critics argue that this could be seen as an attempt to leverage their royal ties while simultaneously distancing themselves from royal duties.

Levin pointed out that the commercialization of the Queen's nickname undermines its intimate significance, transforming a personal connection into a public spectacle.

During the GB News segment, Levin remarked, “This name is just for her because she couldn't say Elizabeth when she was young.

It's very intimate.” She cautioned that those unfamiliar with its history might mistakenly believe the Queen supported the Sussexes' endeavors, further complicating public perception.

Host Eamon Holmes chimed in, questioning whether the couple had indeed copyrighted the name.

Levin confirmed this, calling it a troubling development for the Queen, as it entangles her unique identity with commercial enterprises.

Holmes echoed her sentiments, suggesting that the Sussexes' actions could be interpreted as exploiting their royal connections for personal gain.

As the Sussexes navigate their dual existence as public figures and entrepreneurs, the public response remains divided.

Many sympathize with the late Queen, perceiving the situation as an unwelcome intrusion into her cherished personal history.

Buckingham Palace and representatives for the Sussexes have been approached for comments, but neither side has provided a formal response to these latest claims.

As the story continues to unfold, royal watchers are keenly observing the Sussexes' efforts to balance their roles within the royal family and their aspirations as independent individuals.

What are your thoughts on this unfolding drama?

Share your opinions in the comments below!