Meghan Markle Sparks Controversy with New Baby Name Choice

In a recent episode of his show, GB News host Dan Wootten engaged in a lively discussion with former Fox News presenter Megyn Kelly, delving into the latest happenings both in the UK and the US.

The conversation naturally gravitated towards Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, prompting Dan to question the level of support the Duchess of Sussex commands in America compared to Britain.

Megyn Kelly offered her insights, suggesting that while Americans may be more inclined to support Meghan, there remains a divide along party lines.

According to her observations, Republicans are growing weary of the couple's narrative, viewing them as perpetually playing the victim card, while Democrats embrace them for their openness about mental health struggles.

The dialogue then shifted to the controversial choice of name for Meghan and Harry's newborn daughter, Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor.

It was revealed that the name Lilibet stemmed from the Queen's childhood difficulty in pronouncing her own name, Elizabeth, leading her to adopt the affectionate moniker.

Megyn Kelly highlighted Meghan's scathing remarks against the royal family following her explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey earlier this year.

Megyn expressed incredulity at the decision to name their child after the very matriarch they had accused of racism and mistreatment.

This paradoxical move raised questions about the authenticity of Meghan and Harry's previous allegations.

Dan Wootten chimed in, speculating on the reluctance of Buckingham Palace to voice any objections to the name choice, fearing potential backlash from the outspoken couple.

The discussion veered towards the dynamics within the royal family, with Meghan Kelly remarking on the perceived audacity of Meghan and Harry in naming their daughter without seeking formal approval.

She suggested that given their scathing criticisms of the royal institution, perhaps a more neutral name like Diane would have been a wiser choice.

The irony of honoring the matriarch of a family they had publicly denounced was not lost on the commentators.

As the conversation drew to a close, Dan Wootten couldn't resist a playful jab at Meghan Markle, expressing mild annoyance at the existence of another prominent Meghan in the US, albeit with a different spelling.

The banter between the hosts added a lighthearted touch to an otherwise contentious topic, underscoring the ongoing fascination with the royal couple's every move.

Overall, the discourse shed light on the nuanced perceptions surrounding Meghan Markle in different parts of the world, highlighting the polarizing effect of her actions and statements.

The choice of baby name served as a symbolic battleground, where personal history clashed with public image, leaving observers to ponder the intricate web of royal intricacies and modern celebrity culture.