Meghan Markle Dictates Prince Harry’s Memoir, Accused of Exploiting Royal Title

In a recent interview on GMB, author and commentator Tom Bauer launched a scathing attack on Meghan Markle, accusing her of dictating the agenda of Prince Harry's memoir, “Spare.”

He went on to claim that the book is essentially Meghan's, with Harry merely serving as a figurehead.

However, his assertion was challenged by Ed Balls, who pointed out that the book is written by Harry himself, not Meghan.

Undeterred, Bauer doubled down on his claims, suggesting that the memoir is ghostwritten and insinuating that Harry may not have even read it.

In contrast, he praised Meghan as highly intelligent and sophisticated.

Bauer also claimed that Queen Elizabeth II saw through Meghan, despite protests from Tessa Dunlop, who argued that the late monarch wanted the couple to retain their royal titles.

According to Bauer, other members of the royal family, including Prince William, Prince Charles, and Diana's brother Charles Spencer, were also suspicious of Meghan.

He portrayed her as an adventurous opportunist who came to fame and fortune in America while exploiting her royal status for financial gain.

Jonathan Sacerdoti added to the criticism by suggesting that Prince Harry's choice of title for his memoir, “Spare,” seemed to tap into the trend of embracing victimhood.

Sacerdoti expressed hope that, given Harry's therapy and new life abroad, he would have moved on and chosen a more positive title.

He argued that Harry was never truly treated as a spare, as he was popular and respected for his military service.

Moreover, Harry had the freedom to pursue his interests, enjoy a vibrant social life, and contribute to the royal family's work without the burden of future kingship.

Sacerdoti raised the question of whether Harry now feels like a spare in his new life, often playing second fiddle to his actress wife and her ambitions.

He is frequently seen in her publicity, making appearances as a supporting character.

This dynamic has led some to wonder if Harry's role has diminished in comparison to Meghan's aspirations, such as hosting audio programs, writing picture books, and potentially venturing into politics.

Tom Slater, another expert, commented on the irony of Harry's public life despite his desire for privacy.

He criticized the constant media attention and the perception of Harry as a victim in the therapeutic era.

Slater argued that this portrayal is detrimental to both Harry and the royal family, as it contradicts their intention to move on and establish a private life.

In conclusion, Meghan Markle is accused of dictating the agenda for Prince Harry's memoir, with critics claiming that the book is more reflective of her influence than his own thoughts.

The choice of title and the ongoing discussion surrounding Harry's role and public image have sparked debate about his position within the royal family and his relationship with Meghan.