Must Read
Meghan Markle Allegedly Sends Pictures of Children to King Charles, Claims Omid Scobie
In the latest book by Omid Scobie, titled “Endgame,” explosive allegations have surfaced regarding Meghan Markle's alleged correspondence with King Charles.
Scobie claims that Meghan has been sending pictures of her children, Archie and Lilibet, to the monarch, sparking rumors of a connection between the two.
The revelation of this supposed contact between Meghan and Charles has reignited conspiracy theories surrounding the Duchess of Sussex's pregnancies.
Some theorists suggest that Meghan employed a surrogate and that her children with Prince Harry may not be biologically hers.
In the most extreme cases, it is even claimed that her children do not exist at all.
These theories initially emerged in Paris Match on November 24th, as part of the promotion for Scobie's book, “Endgame,” which delves into the inner workings of the royal family and their fight for survival.
The resurfacing of these theories adds fuel to the fire surrounding Meghan's relationship with the monarchy.
However, Scobie clarifies that Meghan has not been directly emailing the images to King Charles.
According to the author, Meghan is eager for her children to develop a close relationship with their grandfather.
This sentiment, however, does not seem to extend to Prince Harry.
In an interview with People magazine, Scobie reveals that Harry still has unresolved issues with his family.
Since their departure from the royal family three years ago, Meghan and Harry have endured a strained relationship with the institution.
Their shocking Netflix documentary, “Harry and Meghan,” unveiled several revelations about their experiences within the firm.
Scobie's claims align with rumors that the couple has not been invited to celebrate Christmas in the UK.
King Charles has never spent Christmas with his two grandchildren, leading Harry's friend to express the couple's desire to spend the holiday with the royal family.
The Sussexes' last family Christmas at Sandringham took place in 2018, before they relocated to the United States.
However, despite their absence, Meghan and Harry did speak with Charles over the phone to celebrate his 75th birthday, even playing a video of Archie and Lilibet singing “Happy Birthday” to him.
This conversation is said to have marked a turning point in their strained relationship.
Following the release of Omid Scobie's revelations about the royal family, social media erupted with a mix of criticism towards the author and recollections of Meghan Markle's previous fake pregnancy conspiracy theories.
One user sarcastically remarked, “Scobie at it again, King Charles III doesn't have a cell phone.”
Another questioned the legitimacy of Meghan's pregnancies, stating, “I think it's time the public knows the legitimacy of those surrogate-born children, who were fraudulently within the line of succession.”
Netizens also raised doubts about Meghan's physical abilities during her pregnancies.
One user mocked, “If this were true, M most likely sent pictures of the kids to King Charles without him asking or knowing.
No doubt with a note written in calligraphy, it's all part of Harry and Meghan's plan to divide and conquer.”
Another commenter questioned Meghan's bump disappearance, asking, “Where did the bump go when squatting?
Has any pregnant woman managed to squat like that ever with a disappearing bump?
The fake bump that dropped in Birkenhead.”
Critics went as far as calling for child services to intervene and conduct a welfare check on Meghan and Harry's children.
Some claimed that Meghan's choice of footwear during her pregnancies was evidence of her alleged use of a surrogate.
Others argued that her physical movements were impossible for a pregnant woman.
However, amidst the controversy, it is noteworthy that Meghan has not addressed these specific allegations in Scobie's book, leading some to interpret her silence as significant.
In a YouTube video, Lady C confirmed that the Royal Family plans to reveal the truth about Harry and Meghan's supposed invisible children in the spring of next year.
The delay in exposing this information is attributed to its sensitive nature.
As the speculation continues, the public eagerly awaits further developments in this ongoing saga.