Markle Family Drama Escalates: Thomas Markle Questions Existence of Arch and Lilibet

In an astonishing turn of events that feels straight out of a dramatic television series, the Markle family has once again captured the spotlight.

This time, the focus is on Thomas Markle, who has raised eyebrows by casting doubt on the existence of his royal grandchildren, Archie and Lilibet.

Through the voice of his daughter, Samantha Markle, Thomas has added yet another perplexing layer to the ongoing saga of estrangement and accusations that has characterized their family dynamics.

Could it be possible?

Are Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's children merely figments of imagination or perhaps the result of some elaborate deception?

During an interview with Dan Wooten on Outspoken, Samantha Markle boldly proclaimed her role as the “arbiter of truth,” asserting that both she and her father believe Meghan's children might not exist at all.

If they do, she suggested, they may have been born through surrogacy—something the Sussexes are allegedly keeping under wraps.

Samantha expressed chilling certainty about her father's disbelief.

“He doesn't think there are kids,” she claimed, implying that Meghan's secrecy surrounding Archie and Lilibet is part of a larger, manipulative strategy.

According to her, Meghan allegedly uses these children as pawns, controlling access to them as a means of exerting power over others.

Adding fuel to the fire, Thomas Markle reportedly described seeing photographs of Archie that raised suspicions.

Samantha recounted his observations, stating that the infant appeared lifeless, with bandages obscuring his face.

“It didn't move or blink,” she quoted him, emphasizing that every newborn she's encountered has shown signs of life.

To the Markles, this supposed secrecy surrounding the births of Archie and Lilibet is just a piece of a grander scheme.

Samantha didn't hold back in her criticism, accusing Meghan and Harry of manipulating public sentiment to secure their children's standing in the royal line of succession.

“If they used a surrogate, they should have been honest,” she argued, insisting there's no legal or ethical reason to keep such matters hidden.

For her, this is all about deception and control.

Recently, Samantha has made headlines with her hard-hitting remarks aimed at the Sussexes, particularly Meghan.

In an interview with the Daily Mail, she claimed that Meghan's actions towards the royal family were not unprecedented; she had done similar things to her own family and even her parents.

“I knew my dad was suffering, but I thought she'd stop at the Queen,” she lamented.

Initially, Samantha viewed Prince Harry as a victim in this family drama, but her perspective has shifted.

She now believes he plays an equal role in alienating the royal family, especially following the release of his memoir, Spare.

“Meghan has no idea what she's missing out on,” she reflected, expressing regret for the lost time and opportunities for connection.

With a heavy heart, Samantha acknowledged the inevitable pain that will come when her father passes away.

“When my dad goes, it'll be too late,” she stated, emphasizing the void that will be left behind.

“You can't get back that time; it leaves a hole in your heart,” she added, hoping Meghan would one day recognize the depth of their father's love.