Lilibet’s Outfit Choice Raises Eyebrows at Independence Day Parade

Maternity nurse Sarah Dixon has recently raised suspicions about the authenticity of a photograph featuring Lilibet, the two-year-old daughter of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

According to Dixon, the image appears to be heavily edited or even photoshopped, casting doubt on the little girl's outfit and overall appearance.

The photo in question was taken during an Independence Day parade in Montecito, California, just hours before King Charles III's second coronation ceremony in Edinburgh.

Lilibet was captured wearing a patterned blue dress, white socks, and red shoes, exuding an undeniable royal charm.

Many noticed the striking resemblance between her attire and that of Princess Charlotte back in 2016.

At the age of 16 months, Charlotte donned a navy and white dress, complemented by red shoes, a matching cardigan, and white tights.

This unexpected similarity surprised Sarah Dixon, who had previously expected Meghan Markle to opt for a different style for her children, distinct from the traditional choices favored by Kate Middleton.

Dixon, who has worked for various royal households and is now residing in California, expressed her astonishment at seeing Lilibet dressed in such a manner.

She emphasized that this style is not commonly seen among children in the region, even in elite communities or private schools.

The West Coast, according to Dixon, tends to favor more casual and comfortable clothing, such as cotton polos, skirts, tennis shoes, or trainers.

Lace socks and leather red shoes are not typically part of the wardrobe for affluent families in the area.

Furthermore, Dixon pointed out the discomfort that may arise from wearing a long-sleeved dress and high socks in hot weather, especially during a crowded parade.

She questioned the practicality of such attire for any child.

In addition to her concerns about the outfit, Dixon also raised doubts about the authenticity of the photographs themselves.

She claimed that every image of Lilibet appeared to be either heavily edited or a product of photoshop manipulation.

Dixon highlighted specific details that led her to question the integrity of the photographs.

For instance, she observed a black line when zooming in, which she identified as a cut line in Photoshop.

Dixon suggested that Meghan may have changed the clothes on the child to make it appear as if she were wearing a dress similar to Charlotte's.

Additionally, she noticed alterations made to Lilibet's hair, making it appear redder through what she believes to be Photoshop techniques.

Further examination of the images led Dixon to conclude that the child's face had been smudged and manipulated.

She pointed out a noticeable bump on the child's head, created by the blending of the cap and the face.

The lower lip also appeared to be unnaturally shaped, resembling a triangle.

These observations led Dixon to believe that the child's face had been photoshopped into the images.

Dixon also drew attention to discrepancies between the original photo and its edited version.

In the original, the person carrying the little girl was wearing a brown shirt, while in the edited version, Harry was depicted wearing a green shirt.

The arm added to represent Harry's arm failed to match the color of his shirt, remaining brown instead.

Dixon further questioned the presence of certain individuals in the background, suggesting that they may have been added via Photoshop to create the illusion of Harry mingling with the crowd without security.

While these claims raise doubts about the authenticity of the photographs, it is essential to approach them with caution.

It remains unclear whether the images were indeed manipulated or if there is a more straightforward explanation for the discrepancies pointed out by Dixon.

As of now, there has been no official response from the Duke and Duchess of Sussex regarding these allegations.