Lilibet’s Christening Controversy Unveiled

Good Morning Britain host, Kate Garraway, recently shed light on a glaring error in Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's announcement of their daughter Lilibet's christening.

The royal couple had caused a stir by christening their son, Prince Archie, a few months after his birth in Windsor back in May 2019.

However, when Lilibet arrived in June 2021, the family had already departed from the royal scene, settling in California.

Last March, Harry and Meghan surprised their followers by revealing that Lilibet's christening took place at their Montecito residence, marking the first time they used a royal title.

According to a Sussex spokesperson, Princess Lilibet Diana was christened on March 3rd by the Archbishop of Los Angeles, Reverend John Taylor.

During her appearance on GMB, Kate pointed out a significant discrepancy in the announcement, expressing concerns about the Sussexes' communication.

She highlighted the error in labeling the Bishop of Los Angeles as the Archbishop in the statement, emphasizing the importance of accuracy, especially when challenging media reports.

Kate remarked on the irony of inaccuracies coming from a couple known for scrutinizing their portrayal in the media, stressing the need for factual precision.

Reverend John Taylor, who officiated Lilibet's christening, has a background in politics, having served under former President Richard Nixon before entering the clergy.

Taylor currently holds the position of the Bishop of Los Angeles in the Diocese of Los Angeles within the Episcopal Church.

Interestingly, despite his religious role, Taylor's past involvement in politics, particularly as a Republican, adds a unique dimension to his profile.

The timing of Lilibet's christening, occurring three months before her second birthday, sparked speculation due to the contrast with Archie's early christening.

While the delay could be attributed to pandemic-related restrictions on travel, commentator Daniela Elsa raised intriguing questions in the New Zealand Herald, suggesting potential strategic motives behind the timing.

The decision to christen Lilibet at an older age compared to Archie's infancy raised curiosity and prompted various theories among observers.

Dr. Carol Lieberman recently criticized the Sussexes for what she perceived as a desperate move, noting the alteration of their children's surname to Sussex instead of Mountbatten-Windsor following King Charles' coronation in 2023.

Lieberman expressed her views on GBN America, highlighting Meghan's perceived attempt to maintain relevance by clinging to royal associations amid declining popularity.

She characterized Meghan's actions as driven by a desire for constant visibility and speculated on the dynamics of the couple's public image.

In analyzing Meghan's behavior, Dr. Lieberman suggested a pattern of seeking attention and leveraging Harry's royal status for personal gain.

She emphasized Meghan's apparent reliance on Harry's royal connections to sustain her public presence, portraying a narrative of dependency within the couple's dynamic.

Lieberman's observations underscored the complexities of the Sussexes' public image and the evolving perceptions surrounding their post-royal endeavors.