### Justine Bateman Calls Out Sussexes: A Bold Stand Against Celebrity PR Stunts

Just when you thought the Sussexes had exhausted their public relations tactics, Justine Bateman, known for her role in Family Ties, stepped into the spotlight with a fierce critique.

Recently, she took to X (formerly Twitter) to express her disdain for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's visit to a wildfire evacuation center in Southern California.

And her words were anything but gentle.

Bateman wasted no time in labeling the royal couple as “disaster tourists,” accusing them of turning a serious situation into a mere photo opportunity.

She bluntly stated that their presence was not an act of charity; instead, it felt like a calculated publicity stunt.

Her viral post hit hard, stating, “Meghan Markle and Harry are no better than ambulance chasers.

What a repulsive photo-op they achieved.” The sentiment resonated widely, sparking a flurry of reactions online.

As footage from the event circulated, it became evident that Meghan's attempt to appear engaged in crisis management fell flat.

Her mannerisms—nervous glances, awkward embraces, and erratic movements—painted a picture that many found more amusing than reassuring.

One moment she seemed to be inspecting a box as if it contained vital information, and the next, she dashed around the room as if caught in a game of musical chairs.

Harry, on the other hand, appeared equally lost, although he managed to refrain from initiating hugs with every person in sight.

Speaking of those hugs, the internet was quick to question Meghan's habit of embracing strangers.

Who decided that unsolicited hugs equate to compassion?

Judging by social media reactions, it seems that many preferred she kept her arms to herself.

Critics were quick to point out that this display was less about teamwork and more about Meghan's desperate need for validation.

It felt as if she was striving to convince both herself and the public that she was truly part of the relief effort.

Adding to the absurdity was the visible presence of bodyguards, which hardly screamed “we're just like you” to those in need at the site.

The backlash against Meghan and Harry was swift and fierce.

Social media users rallied behind Bateman, labeling the Sussexes as “grief grifters” and praising Bateman for her candidness.

Comments flooded in, with one user expressing outrage at Meghan's apparent exploitation of a tragic situation for personal gain.

Another noted that true relief workers conduct themselves with professionalism, unlike the royal couple, who seemed to waste valuable time.

Bateman's critique extended beyond just Harry and Meghan.

She also took aim at California officials for their mishandling of the wildfire crisis, demonstrating that her frustration wasn't limited to just celebrity antics.

In an interview, she voiced her exasperation with a society filled with “destructive nitwit celebrities and politicians,” showcasing her commitment to authenticity.

As Bateman's commentary continues to gain traction, it becomes increasingly clear that the Sussexes' PR strategies are losing their effectiveness.

When prominent figures in Hollywood begin labeling you as tone-deaf, it might be a sign to reevaluate your approach.

The tide is turning, and Bateman has emerged as a voice of reason amid the chaos.

The internet's support for Justine Bateman has solidified her position as a new favorite in Hollywood—a breath of fresh air known for her unfiltered honesty.

Whether you admire her for her acting skills or her fearless critiques, it's evident that we could use more voices like hers in the world.

As for Harry and Meghan, perhaps it's time for them to take a step back.

When even the stars of Hollywood are expressing their discontent, it might be time to reconsider their tactics.

The message is loud and clear: the public is ready for a change, and they're not afraid to speak up.