### Harry’s Security Saga: A Royal Blame Game

In a twist of royal drama that seems to have no end, Prince Harry has taken to blaming his father, King Charles, for the lack of armed security he claims is necessary for his safety.

This ongoing feud has become a spectacle, with Harry portraying himself as the victim while casting aspersions on his father's responsibility.

The narrative suggests that King Charles is somehow remiss in his duties as a father, leaving many to wonder just how far Harry's grievances will stretch.

According to sources close to Harry, he feels that it is King Charles's failure to act that has put him and his family in jeopardy.

The claim is that the monarch has the power to provide police protection but has chosen not to do so.

This raises eyebrows—how disconnected can Harry really be from the realities of royal protocol?

The situation has reportedly reached a point where King Charles no longer takes Harry's calls, which only adds fuel to the fire of their strained relationship.

Recent leaks to People magazine reveal that Harry believes he has been unjustly denied UK police protection, despite what he perceives as an imminent threat.

While he insists that the King could intervene, Buckingham Palace officials have countered that such decisions are made by an independent committee known as RABIC, which oversees royal security matters.

This committee's judgment, they assert, is unaffected by the whims of the monarchy, a fact that Harry seems unwilling to accept.

Interestingly, Harry's own actions may have exacerbated his security concerns.

His public disclosures about his military experience, including details of his service, might be seen as provocative rather than protective.

It raises the question: if one is genuinely worried about safety, would they really want to draw attention to themselves in such a manner?

The narrative grows even more complex as Harry's camp accuses King Charles's staff of misleading the public about the monarch's intentions.

They argue that while Charles professes love for his son and wishes to see him more often, he simultaneously denies Harry the necessary security to make those visits possible.

It's almost comical how Harry seems to believe that his father can simply override established protocols for his benefit.

Yet, when we look at other members of the royal family, it becomes apparent that Harry's expectations may be unrealistic.

Most royals, including Princess Anne and her children, do not receive round-the-clock police protection unless they are engaged in official duties.

So why should Harry expect special treatment?

The logic simply doesn't add up.

Moreover, Harry's recent eviction from Frogmore Cottage—a residence he and Meghan vacated long before the lease expired—has been cited as another reason for his grievances.

Critics argue that he is using this situation to emotionally manipulate his father into providing the security he desires.

After all, Prince Andrew still resides at the royal lodge, suggesting that the situation may not be as dire as Harry claims.

As discussions about Harry's security continue, many are left questioning the validity of his claims.

If the late Queen had indeed wanted to ensure Harry's protection, wouldn't it have been implemented during her reign?

Instead, Harry's inflated sense of entitlement appears to be the real issue at hand, as he navigates life outside royal duties.

The irony is palpable when considering that Harry has historically leaked personal family matters to the press.

His pattern of behavior—seeking to air grievances publicly while simultaneously demanding privacy—paints a troubling picture of his priorities.

Why would King Charles engage in conversations that are likely to end up splashed across tabloids?

Additionally, there's a growing sentiment that Harry and Meghan have become adept at playing the victim card, a strategy that some believe is designed to garner sympathy while deflecting accountability.

Their absence from family gatherings, such as a summer retreat at Balmoral, has been framed as a consequence of their own actions rather than any royal exclusion.

In the grand scheme of things, the royal family's silence speaks volumes.

They have refrained from leaking personal information about Harry and Meghan, contrasting sharply with the Sussexes' penchant for sharing their narratives with the media.

This discrepancy raises questions about who the real culprits are when it comes to the ongoing saga of leaks and public perceptions.

Ultimately, as Harry continues to navigate his post-royal life, it seems he remains oblivious to the consequences of his choices.

He left royal duties behind, and with that departure came the loss of certain privileges, including state-funded security.

The reality is that if you walk away from a job, you forfeit the benefits that come with it—something Harry appears reluctant to accept.