Exclusive Report Reveals Alleged Cash for Leaks Scandal and Monarchy Split

In a shocking turn of events, a new exclusive report by Byline Times has claimed that a cash for leaks scandal has split the monarchy.

However, skepticism surrounds these allegations as many believe it to be yet another attempt by Meghan and Harry to rewrite history.

The report suggests that Prince Charles pushed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex into commercial deals in the US after withdrawing £700,000 funding for their trial year in Canada.

This move allegedly stemmed from a refusal to remove the name of a Kensington Palace aide, whose partner was receiving money from a tabloid executive editor.

However, it's worth noting that Meghan and Harry had already signed these commercial deals back in 2019, prior to leaving London.

Furthermore, the report claims that this financial sanction led to the collapse of the Sandringham agreement, which aimed to provide the couple with an opportunity to escape the royal press in the UK and continue their public service from North America.

However, Harry himself stated in a docuseries that the late Queen did not give them a choice to be half in and half out royals.

He willingly signed the Sandringham agreement, knowing the consequences it would entail.

While Byline Times is a paid subscription service, some key points have been shared.

One of these points suggests that Prince Harry and Meghan were forced out of the Sandringham agreement due to a lack of funding.

However, it has been widely reported that Charles provided them with approximately £2 million in starter money when they moved to the US, making the claim of insufficient funding questionable.

Another point raised in the report revolves around a partner of a key aide to Prince William allegedly receiving payments from a tabloid for stories about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

However, journalist Dan Wooten, who was mentioned in the report, has already addressed this situation and emphasized that most of the stories about Meghan and Harry came from their own team, not from members of the royal family.

The report also delves into claims regarding Archie's nannying and godparent arrangements, as well as Wooten's breaking story about “Megxit.”

However, Wooten has previously clarified that he had conversations with the Sussexes' staff, who provided their side of the story to balance out the revelations.

The palace conducted an investigation into the aide in question and cleared him of any wrongdoing.

Prince Harry's formal letters before action, which detailed the claims about Wooten and the palace, allegedly put pressure on News UK.

Byline Times claims that Sir Clive Alderton and Lord Peel, key figures in the royal household, urged Harry to alter the legal papers.

When the aide's name was not removed, the report suggests that the Sussexes were left financially vulnerable despite having a security threat level equal to the monarch.

However, the notion that their security threat level matches that of the monarch raises eyebrows.

The report concludes by suggesting that these events drove a wedge through the royal family, leading to Prince Harry's book deal, commercial media deals, and ongoing tensions within the British monarchy.

However, it is important to question the validity of these claims, as it appears that Meghan and Harry are unwilling to accept responsibility for their own choices and continuously blame Harry's family.

Despite their attempts to reshape the narrative, it seems that Meghan and Harry are far from finished with their grievances.

Their refusal to move on and their continuous criticism of the palace and the royal family indicate that bridges have been burned, leaving no way back for the couple.

As they struggle to find success stateside, it remains to be seen how Meghan and Harry will navigate their future while avoiding accountability for their actions.