Exclusive: Prince Harry’s Alleged Helicopter License Raises Doubts

The Sussex PR team recently shared a story claiming that Prince Harry had become a member of a helicopter club in Los Angeles, aiming to fly his family around.

Surprisingly, there have been no sightings of him flying, especially not with his wife and child on board.

Unlike his brother, Harry doesn't seem as enthusiastic about piloting helicopters.

According to The Sun, Meghan and Harry stated that Harry had joined a prestigious helicopter club near their new residence in Santa Barbara, California.

This decision, they explained, would allow Harry to take trips with Meghan and Archie while also ensuring that he maintains a valid and up-to-date helicopter license.

In an effort to confirm this information, a source disclosed to a newspaper that Harry had enrolled in a local flying club in California to fulfill the required number of flight hours per year to prevent his license from expiring, a rule enforced in both the U.S. and the U.K. A close friend of the prince mentioned Harry's pride in his hard-earned license, acquired through dedicated training, starting from basic levels to piloting Apache helicopters.

Despite no plans to return to military service, Harry is dedicated to keeping his flight hours up to date for personal use, allowing spontaneous adventures with Meghan.

However, recent checks on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) website failed to locate any record of Harry's helicopter license.

A Reddit user raised doubts about the legitimacy of Harry's license, given his claims of flying in California.

The article further explores Harry's military background, highlighting that he never served as an actual pilot during his time in the military.

Contrary to his assertion of earning his wings, there is no evidence of a formal ceremony or official announcement by the royal family, unlike when Prince William achieved his wings.

Speculation arises regarding whether Harry may have exaggerated details about his pilot's license, particularly considering the necessity of regular flights to keep it valid.

The piece questions the accuracy of Prince Harry's statements about his helicopter license, pointing out the absence of any supporting proof on the FAA website and suggesting discrepancies in his aviation history.

In another concerning development, Duke of Sussex Prince Harry faces calls to resign from his position amid abuse allegations at his African charity.

Human rights advocates are urging him to step down from the board of African Parks while the charity investigates these claims.

Fiore Longo, campaigns director of Survival International, expressed hope that Harry would act as the human rights advocate he is expected to be.

Longo emphasized that being associated with an organization entails a responsibility to address any human rights abuses occurring within it.

Responding to the accusations of human rights violations, Prince Harry's Archul Foundation informed the Mail on Sunday that upon learning of the serious allegations, he promptly escalated the matter to the CEO and chairman of the board of African Parks for appropriate action.

The pressure on Prince Harry to address these allegations continues to grow, with expectations for accountability and transparency in his role as a public figure.