Exclusive: IRS Launches Investigation into Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Financial Dealings

The financial affairs of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have once again come under scrutiny as the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) initiates a formal investigation into their finances dating back to before their marriage in 2018.

Recent revelations suggest that there are unexplained transactions and discrepancies in their tax returns, particularly during the period when Meghan had business ties with a now-convicted U.S. fugitive.

Before her marriage to Prince Harry, Meghan Markle was primarily recognized for her role in the hit TV series Suits.

However, little was known about her prior association with Bradley Stryker, a wealthy entrepreneur from California involved in pharmaceuticals and real estate.

Stryker had approached Meghan in 2011, offering to invest in her acting career and serve as her business manager and advisor, which she accepted due to her career struggles at the time.

Their professional partnership lasted for about three years, during which Stryker managed Meghan's finances, taxes, and various business ventures.

Unknown to Meghan, Stryker's dealings were not entirely above board.

In 2014, he faced federal charges related to tax evasion, money laundering, fraud, and racketeering, leading to his escape from the U.S. and subsequent capture in Paris in 2019.

His trial exposed his involvement in criminal activities, raising questions about Meghan's possible implication.

As investigators delve into Meghan's financial ties with Stryker between 2011 and 2014, the focus is on whether she benefited from his illicit actions or unknowingly participated in any illegal activities.

The recent IRS probe aims to uncover discrepancies in tax filings and questionable income sources during the period of her collaboration with Stryker, potentially involving issues of tax evasion or money laundering.

Despite Meghan's assertions of ignorance regarding Stryker's criminal endeavors during their partnership, experts suggest the timing of events raises suspicions.

The lack of financial documentation from Meghan's side further complicates matters, with her lawyers claiming that several crucial records are either missing or irretrievable, casting doubt on the transparency of her financial affairs.

Moreover, ongoing cryptocurrency transactions linked to Meghan's overseas accounts have attracted heightened scrutiny, given her and Prince Harry's public endorsement of cryptocurrency investment.

The volatile nature of this asset class, coupled with its potential for illicit fund concealment, adds a layer of complexity to the investigation, prompting questions about the couple's financial integrity.

The investigation also raises concerns about whether Harry could be implicated in Meghan's financial entanglements, considering their shared business ventures and marriage.

Given Meghan's relatively unknown status in the entertainment industry during her association with Stryker, the possibility of undisclosed gains from his connections remains a subject of interest, highlighting the need for full transparency in their financial dealings.

In light of these developments, the key question emerges: what aspects of Meghan's past financial engagements are yet to be revealed, and how might they impact her and Prince Harry's current business ventures?

The intricate web of connections and potential implications stemming from Meghan's association with Stryker underscores the importance of thorough investigation and transparency in navigating the complexities of their financial history.