Dutch Journalist Exposes Meghan’s Blame Game in Controversial Book

A new book has caused a stir in the ongoing saga between Meghan Markle and the British royal family.

In this latest development, Meghan has been accused of blaming Princess Michael of Kent and King Charles for the alleged discrimination she faced during her time as a royal.

However, a Dutch journalist who has already read the book claims that Meghan's accusations may not hold water.

According to Omid Scobie, the author of the upcoming book “Endgame Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy's Fight for Survival,” Meghan wrote letters to King Charles, naming the two household members involved in the conversations about her unborn son Archie's race.

The book allegedly reveals an exchange of letters between Charles and Meghan, confirming that he wanted to explain his disappointment in the distance that had arisen between them after the Oprah interview.

Charles wanted to clarify that there was no ill will or prejudice towards his future grandson.

However, Dutch journalist Rick Evers, who has read the book, disputes Meghan's claims.

He states that Charles is indeed named as the royal discriminator in “Endgame,” along with Princess Michael of Kent.

Evers also mentions that an employee confirmed the existence of the letters between Charles and Meghan.

This raises questions about the credibility of Meghan's allegations.

Evers goes on to defend Charles, highlighting his supportive actions towards Meghan.

He points out that Charles walked her down the aisle at the wedding, treated her as his own daughter, and even arranged for a gospel choir to honor Meghan's ancestry.

Evers questions why Meghan would blame Charles when he has shown nothing but kindness and support.

The journalist further criticizes Meghan, accusing her of spreading lies.

He claims that she altered her appearance by straightening her hair and using makeup to lighten her skin tone before marrying Prince Harry.

Evers also questions Meghan's credibility, suggesting that if there were any letters exchanged between her and Charles, they would have remained private and not leaked to the public.

Regarding Princess Michael of Kent, Evers dismisses Meghan's claim that she asked about Archie's race.

He explains that Princess Michael faced criticism in the past for wearing a controversial brooch to a royal event, which many considered to be racially insensitive.

Evers suggests that Meghan and her co-author, Omid Scobie, may have used this incident to further their narrative.

Evers concludes by criticizing Scobie, accusing him of being biased in favor of Harry and Meghan.

He claims that Scobie has been attacking the royal family and doing Meghan's bidding, and now he is surprised that Prince William no longer wants him at royal engagements.

Evers questions Scobie's credibility and motives, suggesting that he has always been a cheerleader for Harry and Meghan.

As this latest book adds fuel to the ongoing feud between Meghan and the royal family, it remains to be seen how these allegations will impact their already strained relationship.

The public's perception of Meghan's claims may shift as more details emerge, and the truth behind the accusations is revealed.