David Foster’s Intimate Evening Tour to Feature Special Guests, Sparks Questions About Sussex Children

Grammy-winner David Foster is set to make a grand return to the stage at the Wynn's Encore Theatre with his highly anticipated show, “An Intimate Evening with David Foster, Hitman Tour.”

The two-night engagement, scheduled for June 23 and June 24, promises to be an unforgettable experience for music enthusiasts.

Foster will be joined by a star-studded lineup of special guests, including his talented wife, singer, and actress Catherine McPhee, as well as renowned vocalists Pia Toscano and Daniel Emmett, among others.

While the anticipation for the show grows, David Foster recently made headlines when he revealed that he had turned down an invitation to Lilibet's birthday celebration.

Instead, he opted to prioritize his other commitments rather than attending the birthday of someone he had never met.

This decision has sparked further speculation about the existence of the Sussex children, raising questions about their whereabouts.

David Foster's suspicions about the children's existence were reinforced when Prince Harry and Meghan Markle did not bring their two children to the coronation of King Charles.

Surprisingly, no photographs of the birthday celebration have surfaced, leading to doubts about whether Meghan could even find someone to impersonate Archie and Lilibet.

According to some close friends and neighbors of Meghan, Harry, and their Montecito residence, there have been no sightings of the Sussex children.

When David Foster dared to ask about their whereabouts, Meghan reportedly became furious.

The lack of any public appearances or evidence regarding the children's existence has fueled the ongoing speculation.

Adding to the skepticism, Samantha Markle, half-sister of Meghan Markle, has also raised doubts about the existence of Archie Harrison and Lilibet Diana.

During an interview with LBC, Samantha expressed her concerns and highlighted logical conspiracies suggesting that the children may not actually exist.

She pointed out that even their own father, Thomas Markle, has not seen the children's full frontal faces.

These lingering doubts surrounding the Sussex children have seemingly strained the relationship between the Markle family and David Foster's family.

The Sussexes made a big show of their meeting with the Fosters in Macedo, going as far as bringing a photographer along to capture their arrival for a meal.

However, the Fosters were not even present in the photograph, leading to questions about the purpose of such a publicity-driven encounter.

When David Foster inquired about Archie during this meeting, he received a dismissive response, with someone overheard saying, “don't even go there.”

This reaction raised eyebrows among friends and acquaintances, as Catherine Foster had previously claimed that David was like a second father to Prince Harry.

The refusal to discuss children and pregnancy speaks volumes about the sensitivity surrounding these topics.

Furthermore, the use of the name “Lilibet” has also stirred controversy.

As a British expat, I distinctly remember that Queen Elizabeth II rarely used her personal family name publicly.

It was considered more endearing and humanizing to have a pet name.

However, since the appearance of the Sussexes, the name “Lilibet” has been repeatedly mentioned, causing frustration and fatigue among many.

The Queen initially believed that the couple wanted to name their child “Elizabeth,” which she found acceptable.

However, she would never have granted permission for her cherished family nickname to be used, as it holds sentimental value associated with her father, mother, and sister.

The continuous exploitation of this name by the couple has become tiresome and is viewed by some as a deliberate attempt to spread their own version of the truth.

In conclusion, David Foster's upcoming tour has not only generated excitement but has also reignited discussions about the existence of the Sussex children.

The lack of public appearances, coupled with dismissive responses and unanswered questions, has fueled skepticism among both the public and those close to the couple.