**Commonwealth Strips Prince Harry of Invictus Games Patronage Amid Veteran Backlash**

In a significant move, Commonwealth officials have officially stripped Prince Harry of his role as the patron of the Invictus Games.

This decision comes on the heels of mounting pressure from veteran groups who have vocally demanded his resignation.

The fallout from this announcement has ignited a firestorm of controversy, with many observers pointing fingers at Meghan Markle and questioning her influence over Harry in this escalating situation.

Founded by Prince Harry in 2014, the Invictus Games have stood as a symbol of hope and resilience for wounded, injured, and sick servicemen and women.

This international sporting event has earned global recognition for its inspiring message and the positive impact it has had on the lives of veterans.

Harry's involvement was initially seen as a testament to his commitment to the military community, a role he held dear.

However, in recent years, a growing chorus of dissatisfaction has emerged from within the veteran community.

Many veterans felt let down by Harry's decision to step back from his royal duties in 2020, interpreting it as a betrayal of the royal family's long-standing tradition of military service.

This sentiment only intensified after Harry and Meghan relocated to the United States and engaged in various high-profile media projects, which many veterans viewed as distractions from their previously championed causes.

The situation reached a tipping point when several prominent veterans publicly called for Harry to resign from the Invictus Games.

They argued that his recent actions, coupled with controversial public statements and media ventures, had tarnished the Games' reputation and overshadowed its fundamental mission.

Faced with increasing pressure from both veterans and the public, Commonwealth officials took the unprecedented step of removing Harry from his position.

In their statement, they underscored the importance of prioritizing the integrity and mission of the Games over individual affiliations, asserting that the decision was made with the best interests of veterans and the future of the event in mind.

This removal is poised to have profound implications.

For Harry, it signifies a painful severance from one of his most treasured connections to his military past.

It also raises pressing questions about his future involvement in other charitable endeavors, particularly those focused on supporting veterans.

As for Meghan Markle, this development adds yet another chapter to her complex relationship with the British public and media.

The scrutiny she faces is unlikely to diminish; many continue to speculate about her influence over Harry and their joint decisions.

The decision to strip Harry of his patronage is not just a personal loss; it highlights ongoing tensions between him and the veteran community, as well as the contentious dynamics surrounding Meghan.

As the dust settles on this controversial decision, attention will inevitably shift to the future of the Invictus Games and how they will continue to honor and support the brave individuals they were established to serve.

This unfolding drama encapsulates a broader narrative about duty, loyalty, and the challenges faced by those who once wore the crown.