Clear Proof Reveals Archival Foundation’s Backing of Geena Davis in New Media Project

A recent revelation has shed light on the financial backing provided by the Archival Foundation to actress Geena Davis for a new project, raising questions about the selection process.

Despite the presence of numerous accomplished and dedicated women in the media industry who have tirelessly advocated for improved opportunities for women, it appears that the spotlight has shifted to an unexpected figure at the SXSW festival – Megan.

The collaboration between Megan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, and Geena Davis has garnered attention following the release of a report focusing on the portrayal of mothers in the media.

Leveraging her experience as an actress, producer, and mother, Megan expressed her gratitude for the opportunity to work alongside Davis, emphasizing the importance of representation in media.

Established by Megan and Prince Harry in 2021, the Archival Foundation, in conjunction with non-profit organizations Mums First and the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, funded a comprehensive study on the depiction of mothers in the media.

This initiative aligns seamlessly with Megan's passion for advocating for meaningful change, particularly in the realm of gender representation.

Vanity Fair reported on the collaboration between Markle and Davis, highlighting their joint efforts to address the issue of motherhood portrayal in media.

Davis, a vocal advocate for gender equality in media, expressed appreciation for Megan's involvement and the financial support extended by the Archival Foundation, emphasizing the significance of such partnerships in driving impactful change.

However, scrutiny arose regarding the motives behind Archival's financial support for the project, with suggestions that it may have been a strategic move to secure a PR slot for Megan.

This raised concerns about potential missed opportunities for other deserving women in the industry who have long been at the forefront of advocating for gender equality and creative opportunities.

The decision to feature Megan in this project sparked criticism, with detractors arguing that her involvement detracts from the voices of women who have faced significant challenges and obstacles in their pursuit of equality in the media industry.

The focus on Megan's participation has overshadowed the contributions of seasoned female professionals who have dedicated years to advancing the cause of gender equality.

Critics have pointed out that Megan's extensive involvement in various ventures, including charity work, podcasting, film production, and fashion endeavors, may be diluting her focus on more financially lucrative pursuits, such as her Netflix deal and upcoming projects.

The perception of Megan as a multi-faceted figure juggling numerous roles has led to skepticism about the authenticity of her intentions in engaging with initiatives like the one with Geena Davis.

In light of these developments, the debate surrounding Megan's role in the media landscape continues to evolve, with contrasting views on the impact of her involvement in projects aimed at promoting gender equality and representation.

While some applaud her efforts to diversify her portfolio and engage in philanthropic endeavors, others remain skeptical of her true motivations and the potential implications for the broader narrative of women's empowerment in media.