Black History Month Celebrations Amid Royal Controversy

February is a significant month as it marks the beginning of Black History Month, a period dedicated to recognizing the achievements, contributions, and rich heritage of Black Americans throughout history.

The influence of Black Americans in shaping the country cannot be overstated.

During this time, we pay tribute to their legacy by shedding light on stories that have often been overlooked or silenced.

The UK Martin Luther King Centre Black History Month Committee, in partnership with various campus units, has curated a diverse calendar of events aimed at inspiring the campus community to reflect on the past, evaluate the present, and envision the future.

Last year, Prince William and Princess Kate embarked on multiple visits to kick off the UK's Black History Month and commemorate the 75th anniversary of the arrival of the first Windrush Generation migrants.

The Royal Couple commenced their day by engaging with members of the Windrush Simru Elders to learn about the profound impact of the Windrush Generation on the Welsh community.

The Windrush Simru Elders Group, established in 2017 under Race Council Simru, comprises over 50 elders dedicated to raising awareness of ethnic minority issues and celebrating the contributions of the Windrush Generation and individuals of African descent in Wales.

During their visit to Wales, William and Kate also met with representatives from Black History Simru 365, an organization that runs year-round programs acknowledging the invaluable contributions of individuals of African and African-Caribbean descent to local, national, and global history and culture.

However, this year, due to a health incident within the royal family, there has been no official announcement from the Prince and Princess of Wales regarding their participation in Black History Month celebrations.

Across the Atlantic, Meghan Markle has delegated a senior staff member at Archwell to coordinate public relations activities.

A source close to an insider disclosed on Tumblr that, in honor of Black History Month 2024, Meghan Markle intends to send James Holt to embrace some of her ancestors or dispatch boxed lunches to support a political cause.

In response to Meghan's initiatives, a TMZ reporter humorously questions, “Is Meghan embracing her Black heritage again?

Will she be promoting a special bronzer deluxe on HSN for a one-month exclusive?”

In a previous interview, Meghan Markle expressed surprise at the existence of Black History Month in Britain, portraying herself as a victim of discrimination in the UK.

She attempted to shift blame onto the UK, alleging discriminatory practices while being oblivious to her own biases.

This tactic mirrors her previous attempts to feign ignorance about British culture and her husband, Prince Harry, in an effort to appear less intrusive.

Amidst these developments, Meghan and Harry have faced criticism from Quentin in the Daily Mail.

The journalist criticized the couple for their consistent press statements, particularly their recent focus on child safety online.

Quentin described their statements as overly emotional, self-serving, and opportunistic, highlighting their tendency to inject American sentimentality into their public communications.

The Sussexes' involvement in a US Senate hearing addressing internet child safety drew attention to their perceived arrogance and self-aggrandizement.

By positioning themselves as champions of parental struggles, Meghan and Harry sought to center the narrative around their own experiences and virtues rather than the issue at hand.

Their actions have raised questions about Meghan's credentials as a humanitarian and expert, as well as their overall demeanor of superiority and pretentiousness.

As the controversy surrounding the royal couple continues to unfold, observers are left pondering the motivations behind Meghan and Harry's public engagements and the extent of their genuine empathy and advocacy.

The scrutiny they face underscores the complexities of navigating public perception and the delicate balance between leveraging their platform for social good and being perceived as opportunistic and disconnected from reality.