Attorney Drops Prince Harry’s Defense in Hacking Case as Judge Questions Factual Inconsistencies

Attorney David Sherborne has decided to cease representing Prince Harry in the ongoing hacking case after the judge dismissed the Duke's claims as lies.

Even the judge himself is perplexed by the varying recollections presented.

The Duke of Sussex now faces doubts regarding the accuracy of his legal claim, asserting that he was a victim of hacking.

According to Senior Judge Sir Justice Fancourt, there are concerns about Harry's account of an alleged secret agreement within the Royal Family, which supposedly prevented him from taking legal action earlier.

Harry, 38, has accused the late Queen of being involved in a deal with the publisher of The Sun and the News of the World.

He claims that his brother secretly received a substantial sum of compensation from the publisher in 2020.

However, the judge raised questions as to why the details of Harry's 2020 legal claim did not include any mention of the alleged secret agreement.

The Duke now argues that this agreement meant the publisher would not block his compensation claim due to its age.

Furthermore, the judge expressed concern over a factual inconsistency in Harry's current pleaded case.

The Duke stated that he was unaware of the alleged wrongdoing before 2019, yet his proposed amendment suggests that he would have filed the claim in 2012 if not for the secret agreement.

In response, Harry's barrister, David Sherborne, clarified that the 2012 claim would have been significantly different and referred to a draft of an amended particulars of claim that included the alleged secret agreement.

The judge, however, emphasized the factual inconsistencies in the current pleaded case.

Sources have revealed that attorney David Sherborne, a prominent figure in law, is contemplating ending his contract with Prince Harry following the judge's accusation of dishonesty.

Being labeled a liar by the judge is undoubtedly undesirable, and it appears that David is attempting to confuse the matter as much as possible, selectively focusing on one claim while disregarding others.

The settlement reached was not publicly disclosed, which is customary, rather than a secret plot.

There is no cause for concern here.

It seems that Harry's situation is precarious.

Yesterday, Twitter was abuzz with tweets listing celebrities who had agreed to confidential settlements with Murdoch media companies, including Sir Elton John and his husband.

Is Harry insinuating wrongdoing by attacking his close friend Elton?

Will he accuse him of being involved in a secret agreement as well?

This reveals the unpleasant side of Harry's character and his manipulative nature.

He is well aware that his brother and sister-in-law made donations to his charity, including the amount and likely source of those funds.

However, he presents it as if it were a secret deal related to press coverage, rather than a legal agreement between two parties, one of whom suffered greatly due to illegal hacking.

This also hints that Harry himself may be the source of the leak and had access to Catherine's phone.

Let us pause and consider why he would hold onto text messages exchanged between his wife and sister-in-law.

In the Netflix documentary, he even revealed that William had sent him a text.

Harry appears to be fixated on Catherine and harbors resentment and envy towards her and William's proximity to the throne, as he fades into obscurity.

Undoubtedly, the royal family's MI6 personnel uncovered during the lawsuit that all paths led back to Harry.

He was the source of the hack and the one leaking stories to the press.