Meghan Markle Accused of Leaking Information to Bring Down Royal

In a shocking turn of events, Meghan Markle has been accused of using Jason Knauf as a conduit to pass confidential information to Nomid Scobie, co-author of the unauthorized biography “Finding Freedom.”

Critics on social media are claiming that Markle instructed Knauf to deliver a letter to Scobie, which she allegedly sent to a member of the press.

Angela Levin, a well-known critic of the US-based Royal couple, commented on these claims, stating that Knauf is an honorable man.

The Court of Appeal recently heard evidence that contradicts Markle's assertions that a letter she sent to her father, Thomas Markle, was intended for his eyes only.

Text messages sent by Markle to a Royal aide reveal that the letter was actually written with public consumption in mind.

This revelation came to light during the ongoing legal battle between Markle and the publisher of the Mail on Sunday and Mail Online, who are challenging a previous High Court judgment that deemed their decision to publish extracts of Markle's 2018 letter as unlawful.

According to Andrew Caldercott QC, representing the publisher, the new evidence from Knauf in the form of texts raises doubts about Markle's credibility.

He argued that the letter was crafted with the possibility of public consumption in mind, rather than being an intimate communication solely intended for her father.

Caldercott further stated that Markle was aware that Thomas Markle might disclose the letter to the media.

This contradicts Markle's claim that the fundamental point of her letter was false, as it was written specifically with the potential for public exposure.

Additionally, the publisher believes that Thomas Markle had the right to reveal the contents of the letter to correct inaccuracies contained in an article published in People magazine.

This article featured an interview with five friends of Markle who spoke in detail about the same note.

The publisher argues that the new evidence from Jason Knauf also contradicts Markle's denial of cooperating with the authors of “Finding Freedom,” a book that was published long after the articles in question but substantially supports Markle's case against her father's behavior prior to the wedding.

In light of these developments, the publisher contends that Markle no longer had a reasonable expectation of privacy when the articles were published, as the letter was written with public consumption in mind.

They argue that Markle's right to privacy was outweighed by Thomas Markle's right of reply, the need for correction, and the wider public interest.

The publisher also claims that contemporaneous documents show that Markle's pleaded case is materially false.

Despite her denial of any cooperation with the authors of “Finding Freedom,” evidence from Knauf suggests otherwise.

These revelations raise significant questions about Markle's credibility and have intensified the ongoing legal battle between her and the publisher.

As the court proceedings continue, the public awaits further developments in this high-profile case that has captivated audiences worldwide.