Prince Harry’s Legal Action Sparks Controversy Over Security Funding

Prince Harry has recently taken legal action against the UK government after his police bodyguards were withdrawn, citing concerns for his family's safety if they were to return to the UK without protection.

This move has prompted a scathing response from royal commentator Sarah Vine, who penned an article titled “Prince Harry, if you still want security for the family, make sure your mates at Netflix pay for it.”

Vine starts her piece by highlighting the timing of Harry's decision, suggesting that he intentionally chose a moment when the Queen is already dealing with numerous pressing issues.

She goes on to criticize him, calling him a “whining, pathetic bore” and an “entitled, tedious little ingrate.”

According to Vine, Harry has not only turned his back on his family but has also publicly aired his grievances and even targeted his 95-year-old grandmother.

The commentator asserts that it was Harry and Meghan's own choice to leave behind their royal duties and seek a different life in America.

She emphasizes that this decision was solely theirs, and while they may believe they were forced into exile by an ungrateful nation, the reality is that they had other options.

They simply wanted more than what they perceived as the limitations of their royal existence.

Vine argues that the couple's problems stemmed from their own attitude and their tendency to view any criticism as hostility.

She accuses them of behaving like “woke evangelists,” lecturing others on proper behavior while displaying hypocrisy and arrogance.

Vine points out their use of private jets despite advocating for climate change and their reliance on taxpayer funds while refusing to fulfill their responsibilities.

The commentator asserts that Harry and Meghan have consistently portrayed themselves as victims, refusing to acknowledge their own role in the ongoing drama.

She highlights that the loss of their taxpayer-funded security was a consequence of their decision to distance themselves from the royal family and relocate to California.

Vine questions why the British people should continue to pay for individuals who no longer wish to be associated with the country or its monarchy.

Vine concludes her article by suggesting that if Harry desires security, he should rely on his connections with Netflix, referring to the lucrative deals the couple has secured since leaving their royal roles.

She predicts that the streaming giant would willingly finance their protection in exchange for another opportunity to criticize their homeland.

The commentator expresses her disappointment in Harry's aggressive legal action, particularly during a difficult time for the Queen, implying that he has become the type of person who would sue his own grandmother.

In summary, Prince Harry's decision to take legal action against the government regarding his security funding has sparked a heated debate.

Sarah Vine, a royal commentator, has strongly criticized Harry's actions and questioned why the British taxpayer should continue to support a couple who have distanced themselves from their royal duties.

She suggests that if Harry wants security, he should turn to his new allies at Netflix.