Title: Meghan’s Influence on Harry’s Statement Raises Concerns about Royal Family Unity

: In a surprising turn of events, Meghan Markle's influence over Prince Harry has once again come into the spotlight.

The Duchess of Sussex has been known to have a strong presence in their decision-making, but recent developments suggest that her control extends even further.

This time, it involves a statement written by Harry following the death of Queen Elizabeth on September 8th.

Paragraph 2: Harry's heartfelt tribute to his grandmother, which he addressed as “Granny,” raised eyebrows among royal watchers.

A comparison with statements from other members of the royal family, including Princess Beatrice, Princess Eugenie, and Prince William, reveals stark differences in style and word usage.

It is evident that Meghan played a significant role in crafting Harry's statement.

Paragraph 3: Linguists have pointed out the distinct American influence in Harry's words.

While Beatrice, Eugenie, and William refer to the Queen as “Granny” ending with “E-A,” Harry uses “Granny” ending with “N-Y.”

This small detail suggests that an American hand was behind the composition of Harry's statement.

Social media users quickly noticed this discrepancy and began speculating about Meghan's involvement.

Paragraph 4: Not only did Meghan introduce an American touch to the language, but there were also inaccuracies in the military titles used to address the Queen.

Harry referred to her as “Commander-in-Chief,” whereas the correct title is “Colonel-in-Chief.”

This mistake, which Harry surely knows, further supports the notion that Meghan and her PR team were responsible for the statement.

Paragraph 5: The implications of Meghan's influence on Harry's statement are concerning.

If true, it suggests that Harry was either coerced into writing what Meghan wanted or was kept in the dark about its contents.

Either way, it raises questions about the couple's intentions and their future actions within the Royal Family.

The situation demands heightened vigilance from the rest of the family.

Paragraph 6: King Charles' decision to ban Harry and Meghan from Buckingham Palace for a high-profile reception seems justified now.

The concerns over Meghan's influence and the potential risks she poses to the unity of the Royal Family cannot be ignored.

There is a growing sense that the family needs to protect itself from any further interference or manipulation.

Paragraph 7: Twitter users wasted no time in expressing their opinions on the matter.

Many criticized Harry for his apparent lack of autonomy and inability to write a heartfelt tribute to his grandmother.

Some even questioned his emotional connection to the Queen, suggesting that Meghan handles everything on his behalf.

The sentiment among these users was clear: Harry and Meghan should leave the Royal Family and focus on their own lives.

Paragraph 8: The impact of Meghan's influence on Harry's statement goes beyond mere words.

It highlights a larger issue of trust and loyalty within the Royal Family.

With every new development, it becomes harder to rely on Harry's judgment and allegiance.

The fear of wiretapping and leaks to external platforms like Netflix or Spotify only adds to the growing unease.

Paragraph 9: In conclusion, the recent revelation about Meghan's role in shaping Harry's statement for Queen Elizabeth's passing has raised serious concerns about the couple's intentions and their place within the Royal Family.

The differences in language and military titles used in the statement point to Meghan's influence and control over Harry.

The Royal Family must remain vigilant and take necessary measures to protect their unity and reputation moving forward.