Meghan Markle Faces Backlash Over Invictus Games Changes

Tensions are rising as veterans and royal enthusiasts voice their frustrations regarding Meghan Markle's perceived influence on the upcoming Invictus Games.

Accusations of her pushing a “woke” agenda have sparked heated debates, with many feeling that her involvement has crossed a line.

The latest controversy?

A reported decision to swap traditional rifles used in shooting competitions for laser guns, a move that some believe undermines the very spirit of the event.

The rationale behind this change is said to be centered on inclusivity, but critics argue that it reflects Markle's personal anti-gun stance rather than a genuine effort to honor military traditions.

Veterans are expressing their outrage, emphasizing that these games were established to celebrate their service and sacrifices.

One veteran passionately stated that using rifles was a significant symbol of their experiences, and replacing them with laser guns is a blatant disrespect to the essence of the Invictus Games.

Concerns about the practicality of laser guns have also been raised, particularly by U.S. veteran Christopher Bride.

He recounted past events where laser guns malfunctioned in cold weather, leading to obstructed targets and equipment failures.

Just imagine dedicating months to training only to face setbacks due to faulty gear.

This frustration resonates deeply with veterans who feel that the integrity of the games is being compromised.

Many veterans view this decision as an affront to their dedication and resilience.

The Invictus Games were meant to honor their strength, not serve as a platform for celebrity virtue signaling.

One critic bluntly stated that the focus should not be on safety or inclusivity but rather on addressing what they perceive as Markle's attempt to impose her ideals on the event.

As the backlash intensifies, discussions about a potential boycott of the games are gaining traction among veterans.

One veteran lamented that Prince Harry seems more invested in his public image than in honoring those who served.

This sentiment highlights a growing divide between the Sussexes and the very community the Invictus Games aim to support.

Looking ahead to the 2025 Invictus Games in Canada, a recent poll conducted by Express.co.uk revealed that an overwhelming 94% of respondents believe Meghan should refrain from attending.

Many fans are urging Harry to attend solo, fearing that Meghan's presence would shift the spotlight away from the veterans and onto royal controversies.

PR expert Edward Coram James aptly noted that Meghan's attendance could overshadow the event, while her absence might lead to speculation about the couple's relationship.

Adding to the swirling controversy, a recent article from Vanity Fair accused Meghan of exhibiting mean girl behavior towards her former staff, with some ex-employees reportedly needing long-term therapy after working with her.

In light of such allegations, it's no surprise that many are advocating for her to sit this one out.

Moreover, Meghan's influence on Harry's personal choices has also come under scrutiny.

Reports suggest that she persuaded him to abandon his once-beloved hunting hobby, leading him to sell his prized rifles for over $60,000.

While this is a personal decision, it contributes to the narrative that Meghan tends to reshape traditions to align with her values, whether it's regarding hunting practices, royal protocols, or now, the Invictus Games.

As the games approach in February, excitement is tinged with frustration for many veterans.

With over 500 participants from more than 20 countries set to compete in adaptive sports, including new events like snowboarding and alpine skiing, the focus should ideally be on celebrating their achievements.