Meghan Markle’s Royal Revival: A Signet Ring and a Dash of Hypocrisy

Meghan Markle, the woman who famously distanced herself from the rigid confines of the British monarchy in favor of a life brimming with freedom in sunny California, seems to have a hard time severing those royal ties.

Recently, she was spotted sporting a striking signet ring engraved with her royal cipher, a move that raises eyebrows given her vocal disdain for the very institution she now appears to embrace.

Isn't it curious?

The same Meghan Markle who once proclaimed her desire for privacy and independence is now flaunting a piece of jewelry that symbolizes the monarchy she has criticized.

During her recent visit to Canada for the Invictus Games, sharp-eyed royal watchers noticed the eye-catching ring adorning her right pinky finger.

This isn't just any ring; it features the intertwined initials of her and Prince Harry, a design they first unveiled during their wedding in 2018.

Once associated with their Sussex Royal brand, this monogram has become a point of contention.

After facing backlash for its continued use, Meghan and Harry reluctantly transitioned to their Archewell branding in 2021.

Yet here we are in 2025, with Meghan proudly displaying that royal emblem once more.

It's almost as if the allure of royalty is too strong to resist.

Markle's identity seems inextricably linked to her royal past.

Despite her efforts to redefine herself as a Hollywood philanthropist, a popular podcaster, and an inspirational lifestyle figure, there's an undeniable sense that she craves the recognition that comes with being a duchess.

Without those royal connections, does she feel less significant?

It's a thought-provoking question.

Much like a child unwilling to part with a favorite toy, Meghan appears intent on reminding the world of her royal status.

And it doesn't stop at the signet ring.

Remember the infamous “Duchess of Sussex” Dior handbag?

Or the monogrammed doormat?

Rumors swirl about her collection of monogrammed towels and bed linens, making it seem like she's turning her home into a shrine for the very institution she claimed to reject.

This contradiction is hard to ignore.

Meghan has accused the royal family of perpetuating racism and colonialism, yet she seems unbothered about leveraging royal symbols when it suits her.

Isn't that an interesting twist?

For someone who insists she has moved on from royal obligations, she certainly spends a lot of time trying to prove otherwise.

Her refusal to relinquish the title and her consistent use of royal imagery suggest a longing for the world she left behind.

Surrounding herself with individuals who perpetuate the idea of her as a modern princess only adds to the irony.

It's almost tragic at this point—an ongoing struggle between her desire for independence and her attachment to royal prestige.

As she continues to navigate this complicated relationship with her past, one can't help but wonder: is she truly free, or is she simply playing a different role in the same old story?

The duality of her existence raises questions about authenticity and the lengths to which one might go to maintain a certain image.